|
||
|
31st October 2010, 07:20 | #11 |
Banned
MG ZT V6 190+ Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 33,223
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,614 Times in 1,416 Posts
|
i take it they will be supplied as show plates,not displaying a manufacturer's id or a postcode..when you get the correct lettering i would be interested.
|
31st October 2010, 07:50 | #12 |
Gets stuck in
MG ZT-T CDTi, MGF 1.8i Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wolverhampton.
Posts: 754
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Why all the hullabaloo. If all you fail your MOT on is a B.S mark on your plate the I'd call that a result. I have never had plates with a B.S mark or suppliers address on them and I reckon as long as the font, spacings and the colour is correct then they won't get a second look. Take your car in a month early for it's MOT then if it passes you have 13 months MOT if it fails you have a month to get some new plates.
|
31st October 2010, 08:00 | #13 |
Gets stuck in
rover 75 saloon 1.8t Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: burnley
Posts: 512
Thanks: 32
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
just keep the old plates in the boot.you can change them if asked
|
31st October 2010, 08:13 | #14 |
Gets stuck in
MG ZT-T CDTi, MGF 1.8i Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wolverhampton.
Posts: 754
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
That works well also
|
31st October 2010, 09:09 | #15 | |
Regular poster
MG ZT 190+ Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rotherham
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
However, this font is a fairly accurate representation for free.. http://www.fontspace.com/jonathan-paterson/london-tube |
|
31st October 2010, 11:49 | #16 |
Regular poster
MG ZT 135+ Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bristol
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi guys - thanks for supplying info on the fonts - those examples both look better. I think they have used Arial and then fiddled with the font size to get the title case look. If the proper font is used, MG Rover Group (i.e. title case) will translate into the correct sized lettering and the letters 'over' and 'roup' will be slightly smaller capitals.
The supplier won't put a postcode or BS number on them which is fair enough so in that respect they will be show plates. However with the correct UK79 lettering I don't envisage any issues with the MOT. Old plates in the boot won't work though - they will have a different registration because I am buying these plates because I am transferring a private plate I will get back to Gill and suggest that she uses the fonts provided above.
__________________
Proud owner of an MG ZT 135+ in Starlight Silver with Option Pack [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
31st October 2010, 13:05 | #17 |
I really should get out more.......
Now Other Manufacturer Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Co. Kerry
Posts: 2,786
Thanks: 16
Thanked 310 Times in 283 Posts
|
The MOT test for numberplates has been tightened up recently, apart from the general layout - spacing, odd bolt heads etc., on vehicles first registered on or after 1st September 2001, they check that the registration plates:
Display the name and postcode of the supplying outlet. Display a BSAU145d marking. Do not display a honeycomb or similar effect background. On a dual purpose registration plate, only an acceptable international symbol or flag is displayed. So you may need a 'normal' set at MOT time. |
31st October 2010, 13:09 | #18 |
Regular poster
MG ZT 190+ Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rotherham
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Actually I'm not sure you know.. I don't think the font on the P22 site i.e Underground and the London Tube fonts are correct...
I think the plate supplier is more accurate in the representation as far as I can tell in your images.. Compared... Look at the R and P's the top portions are elongated, they are not in either of those two fonts. The bottom of the U is also elongated and not in those fonts. Although I would say the G is probably more accurate in the font sets. Last edited by Swampster; 31st October 2010 at 13:47.. |
31st October 2010, 13:14 | #19 | |
I really should get out more.......
MGZTT2.5 V6 190+ SE 2002 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Gilfach-goch
Posts: 2,201
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
31st October 2010, 17:33 | #20 |
Regular poster
MG ZT 135+ Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bristol
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
That is a very useful comparison Swampster - I haven't sent the email yet so I'll just ask about the Rover logo.
The other issue about the BSAU145d mark and the name and postcode of the supplier is a bit of a conundrum. If I could get anything on the net, I'd have that mark and the postcode to be added too - but they have said they won't do that. I can understand their concern but in this particular case they could put the Longbridge postcode on as the supplier is no longer in business. Presumably MOT testers simply check the information is there - they don't verify that the supplier named actually produced those plates. I may try to see if I can get them from Ireland as then the supplier won't be covered by UK legislation. What I really want is a properly legal plate that won't cause issues at the MOT. I don't want to be swapping plates over or having to carry a spare set.
__________________
Proud owner of an MG ZT 135+ in Starlight Silver with Option Pack [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
|
|