Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > Technical Help Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28th August 2015, 07:50   #111
SD1too
Doesn't do things by halves
 
SD1too's Avatar
 
Rover 75 2.5 Connoisseur Auto (1999) Dealer launch model.

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Former Middlesex
Posts: 20,608
Thanks: 1,587
Thanked 3,749 Times in 3,181 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorset Bob View Post
The time limit is in place to capture the low mileage engines, which are often operated in more arduous conditions.
I accept your point Bob but there is actually a separate schedule for this. It covers engine oil & all filters, brakes, suspension and steering and ancilliary drive belts but not the timing belts. How strange eh?
Quote:
This is, more often than not, frequent cold starts and operating in stop/ start situations. This obviously places more wear and tear on the components (including the belts) compared to a vehicle that, for example, spends most of the time on a motorway.
I agree, but if the additional wear and tear were believed to cause failure before 90,000 "normal" miles, then I'd expect the cambelt to be included in the "Arduous driving conditions, additional requirements" section of the service sheet.
Quote:
I think that it is best that people are not encouraged to play Russian Roulette with their engines.
Two points on that Bob: it's only Russian Roulette if you believe in the six year period and the only thing that I'm encouraging is thought and analysis of the evidence available. Each reader is entitled to do what they wish with their engine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolin View Post
Simon, how do you know that the Gaydon has not had its belts changed?
I don't Colin. If it has (and I very much doubt it) then I won't be able to quote that car as an example any more. However, there is club members' evidence too, and those cars have been subjected to normal, or perhaps abnormal, wear and tear as Bob mentioned.

Simon
__________________
"Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble."
Sir Henry Royce.
SD1too is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2015, 08:35   #112
Dorset Bob
Senior Citizen
 
Dorset Bob's Avatar
 
Rover 75 2.5 Connoisseur SE,Chrysler 300C,124 Spider, Daytona 955i,Honda XL250 & Royal Enfield 650GT

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Kingdom of Wessex
Posts: 6,976
Thanks: 2,391
Thanked 2,685 Times in 1,686 Posts
Default

In the recent past, I have spoken to the curator at Gaydon and the first Rover 75 car is still on the original belts. This is due to the unusual scenario of it being predominately a display car, being unregistered and not used on the road.

I feel that it is a red herring to use this as an example, as I can’t think of any other car that is like this one.
Perhaps this one currently for sale would be a better example.


http://www.the75andztclub.co.uk/foru...light=motorway
__________________



Let the good times roll............



Dorset Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2015, 09:28   #113
Stag>75
Gets stuck in
 
Rover 75 Saloon 2.5

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 563
Thanks: 52
Thanked 96 Times in 80 Posts
Default

Only as FYI: I changed the original belts on my 2001 R75 last year with it having done 75,000KM's. The previous one owner was elderly and the car clearly had an easy life. The belts were perfect, no cracks or any sign of deterioration. I could not tell any difference in length between the original and the new ones. I do think the idler and tensioner pulleys may have been a bit noisy, but then again I believe one of the new ones made a bit of a metallic scraping noise for a few minutes when I started it up ....

But my Power Steering pump has a whirr, I can only put that down to the strut top bearings being almost seized when I bought it. Seems to be one issue not driven by mileage.
Stag>75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2015, 09:48   #114
murphyv310
This is my second home
 
Hyundai i10 998cc

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kilmarnock
Posts: 6,602
Thanks: 2,088
Thanked 2,298 Times in 1,349 Posts
Default

Hi.
When I was in my last job one of our customers was Gates in Dumfries. I managed to chat to one of the boffins one day and he came up with some interesting points.
A great many belts are generic, often they are the same belts used in many different applications, not just as timing or cam belts but transmission drive belts for road sweepers, conveyor systems and all sorts.
He made the point to me that on other uses the belt is "inspection" only on an annual service and the belt can actually last 20 or more years with no visible wear, in other cases they can fail in 5 years.
The reason the car manufacturer specifies a time as well as mileage is the different operating conditions in a car.
The loading on a timing belt is constantly changing, pulses from the cams, changes in engine speed alters the loading but more importantly thermal changes and that happens on low mileage engines too.
As my man in gates said to me, a toothed belt that is the same type as in an engine that's used on a conveyor system will last for years but may just break in an engine due to ageing, I personally would rather stick with the recommendations, its not a conveyor we are driving!
__________________
Cheers from Trevor
MM0KJJ
murphyv310 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2015, 10:42   #115
SD1too
Doesn't do things by halves
 
SD1too's Avatar
 
Rover 75 2.5 Connoisseur Auto (1999) Dealer launch model.

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Former Middlesex
Posts: 20,608
Thanks: 1,587
Thanked 3,749 Times in 3,181 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorset Bob View Post
In the recent past, I have spoken to the curator at Gaydon and the first Rover 75 car is still on the original belts.
Thanks Bob for clearing up that point.

Quote:
I feel that it is a red herring to use this as an example ...
I can understand this, since your reasoning for replacement on a time basis includes possible increased stress due to the number of engine stops and starts. But for those who advocate replacement after 6 years per se, surely the Gaydon car is the perfect example. It may not include arduous driving conditions but it certainly addresses the time factor alone.

Simon
__________________
"Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble."
Sir Henry Royce.
SD1too is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2015, 10:56   #116
murphyv310
This is my second home
 
Hyundai i10 998cc

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kilmarnock
Posts: 6,602
Thanks: 2,088
Thanked 2,298 Times in 1,349 Posts
Default

One thing to consider is this. How many engines have you stripped that have been stationary for weeks or months? Well if you have you will see the belt has taken on a "set" where it was stopped at. This happens even over night. This is actually lightly stressing the belt, once running the stress changes again. Surely a belt stopped is still under stress and likely to develop minute cracks around pulleys, the set they develop would in my opinion be the worry on low mileage cars
__________________
Cheers from Trevor
MM0KJJ
murphyv310 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2015, 08:58   #117
Phil-T4
I really should get out more.......
 
Phil-T4's Avatar
 
MG ZT-T, Rover 75 Tourer

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Olney
Posts: 2,969
Thanks: 245
Thanked 1,088 Times in 657 Posts
Default

Personally i've not seen a "worn" belt as such but the idler pulleys are a different matter, the plastic wheel broken, cracked and the centre bearings breaking up.

Its the same scenario as engine oil, change it every 15000 miles or yearly, so if you only did 1K per year would you only change it after 15 years ignoring the recommended time interval? No i dont think so!
Phil-T4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2015, 09:25   #118
mh007
This is my second home
 
mh007's Avatar
 
MG ZT260 SE, MG ZT190+, MG ZTT 160, R75 Conn SE 2.0, R75 Conn SE 2.5 X 3, R75 Club SE 1.8, P5B Coupe

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Keynsham, Bristol
Posts: 4,211
Thanks: 65
Thanked 635 Times in 499 Posts
Default

I would agree that the only 'broken' or visually 'worn' belts I have come across on the KV6 have been the result of one of the three pulleys (tensioner/idler/water pump) either broken up or worn due to bearing issues (or both if the bearing has seized !)

I also agree that because these belts are under a constant tension & this must take its toll even you can't actually see it.

In my opinion, it's a no brainer..............if you care about the car & its engine, why wouldn't you change the belts etc on or even a little before the recommended interval ?!!
mh007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2015, 10:20   #119
topman
This is my second home
 
topman's Avatar
 
MG ZT-T 190

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 5,493
Thanks: 372
Thanked 647 Times in 534 Posts
Default

I think you can in some ways ignore the time limits in the right circumstances but you have to be sensible. In years to come would a barn find 30 years old with 30,000 miles be left till it hits 90,000 miles? I don't think you would.
topman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2015, 10:40   #120
Richcl
Avid contributor
 
Richcl's Avatar
 
MG ZT

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Tewkesbury
Posts: 172
Thanks: 3
Thanked 31 Times in 26 Posts
Default

I'd have to change my belts when due as the stress of driving and thinking it could go anytime would be to much!

My old Cortina broke it's cam belt a few times, used to go when pulling away from standstill. Not the best thing to happen at traffic lights when sat in a queue of traffic!
Richcl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd