Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > Technical Help Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4th March 2011, 05:51   #11
dissy1810
Posted a thing or two
 
mgzt 160 1.8 lpg

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: newcastle upon tyne
Posts: 1,973
Thanks: 5
Thanked 72 Times in 64 Posts
Default

i have a romano system in my non turbo which works well i also have a spare inlet manifold with the gas pipes in you can have if you want it as i changed mine to a vvc one
dissy1810 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2011, 07:21   #12
Yella Fella
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Yella Fella's Avatar
 
None at the moment

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Glasgow's HMP Barlinnie, 'A' Hall, 2nd Flat
Posts: 5,192
Thanks: 493
Thanked 1,094 Times in 666 Posts
Default

What sort of cost is involved if a garage fitted a system?
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Yella Fella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2011, 10:07   #13
Bernard LPG
I really should get out more.......
 
75 V6 Saloon 2003 LPG MGZT V8 260 LPG

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Evesham
Posts: 2,134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pianoman58 View Post
Bernard, How do you get the gas coming out of the evaporator ( which they all work on a "on demand" principle ) at very low pressure ( i've never measured it but it can only be a 1 or 2 psi ) to overcome the boost pressure in the inlet manifold which even in a low boost engine like a 1,8 k series is at least 7psi? When the engine is in a boost condition it needs a lot more gas, not less or none at all.
Unless you put the boost pressure into the back side of the diaphram in the evaporator in order to equalize the pressure in the manifold, but then, when you came off boost it would suck the diaphram backwards and again stop the gas flow, so you would have to have some sort of boost actuated solenoids to vent the back of the diaphram to atmostphere when not running in boost condition.
If you put a mixer plate before the turbo as with the old feedback system it would work, but if you ever got a backfire up the inlet, the resulting explosion would be spectacularly massive !!
Which make of system have you used on turbo engines
There has been a clear shift in technology since the system you are describing, Stephen. The modern systems supply vapour under pressure at typically say 1.0 bar above the manifold pressure. The flow of gas is then metered into the seperate inlet branches by a set of 'injectors' whose opening times are calculated from intercepts on the petrol injector feeds. There is no venturi in the system.

A small pipe is tapped into the manifold close to the throttle butterfly to provide a sense pressure to the diaphragm and also converted to an electrical level to give a reference to the gas ECU.

Therefore it does not matter what pressure the manifold is at, the pressure of the gas supply will always be at a set level above it. The ambient pressure has been taken out of the equation.

The metering of gas is very accurate and will meet the latest Euro pollution requirements, something the old venturi systems cannot meet.

To answer the question of the old venturi systems running a turbo, you are quite right in saying that a balance pipe is required behind the diaphragm. This will obviously follow the inlet pressure but it has no venturi and merely compensates for the pressure, but the feed pipe, being coupled to a venturi, will have the same pressure minus the depression created by the flow through venturi.
I can assure you that it worked well, but I was very glad when the multipoint systems were introduced about ten years ago.

As for the systems I have been using, I have learned the hard way to steer clear of the cheap end of the market, though I know that individuals have been happy with them. Equally, the top end of the market is over valued for what you get. So I have been very happy to fit systems from the AEB stable which are very easy to obtain spare parts and service for pretty well everywhere.

So systems such as OMVL, Zavoli and Romano are fairly ubiquitous and sit in the mid-market position.

Oh! and by the way, the Ford system was hopelessly unreliable and the supply company went out of business, leaving the systems high and dry. This did a lot of damage to the industry generally and is one source of the 'pub talk' which blights us, a bit similar to the 'Rover effect' I suppose.
Bernard LPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2011, 07:15   #14
marinabrian
 
marinabrian's Avatar
 
MG ZT

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 20,151
Thanks: 3,565
Thanked 10,837 Times in 5,718 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bernard LPG View Post
There has been a clear shift in technology since the system you are describing, Stephen. The modern systems supply vapour under pressure at typically say 1.0 bar above the manifold pressure. The flow of gas is then metered into the seperate inlet branches by a set of 'injectors' whose opening times are calculated from intercepts on the petrol injector feeds. There is no venturi in the system.

A small pipe is tapped into the manifold close to the throttle butterfly to provide a sense pressure to the diaphragm and also converted to an electrical level to give a reference to the gas ECU.

Therefore it does not matter what pressure the manifold is at, the pressure of the gas supply will always be at a set level above it. The ambient pressure has been taken out of the equation.

The metering of gas is very accurate and will meet the latest Euro pollution requirements, something the old venturi systems cannot meet.

To answer the question of the old venturi systems running a turbo, you are quite right in saying that a balance pipe is required behind the diaphragm. This will obviously follow the inlet pressure but it has no venturi and merely compensates for the pressure, but the feed pipe, being coupled to a venturi, will have the same pressure minus the depression created by the flow through venturi.
I can assure you that it worked well, but I was very glad when the multipoint systems were introduced about ten years ago.

As for the systems I have been using, I have learned the hard way to steer clear of the cheap end of the market, though I know that individuals have been happy with them. Equally, the top end of the market is over valued for what you get. So I have been very happy to fit systems from the AEB stable which are very easy to obtain spare parts and service for pretty well everywhere.

So systems such as OMVL, Zavoli and Romano are fairly ubiquitous and sit in the mid-market position.

Oh! and by the way, the Ford system was hopelessly unreliable and the supply company went out of business, leaving the systems high and dry. This did a lot of damage to the industry generally and is one source of the 'pub talk' which blights us, a bit similar to the 'Rover effect' I suppose.
Hi Bernard, I was thinking about a Tartarini Etagas 2 system, I was wondering if you've had any experience with this type of system, as my conversions so far have been limited to fairly simple mixer systems, with lambda feedback.
Many thanks
Brian.
marinabrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2011, 12:18   #15
Bernard LPG
I really should get out more.......
 
75 V6 Saloon 2003 LPG MGZT V8 260 LPG

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Evesham
Posts: 2,134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marinabrian View Post
Hi Bernard, I was thinking about a Tartarini Etagas 2 system, I was wondering if you've had any experience with this type of system, as my conversions so far have been limited to fairly simple mixer systems, with lambda feedback.
Many thanks
Brian.
I used a lot of EtaGas 1 which was very good in it's day but rather expensive.
I moved away from the marque at the next generation because other systems had caught up in terms of technology and were cheaper, even when buying EtaGas directly from abroad.
So, the simple answer is no, nor do I see them out in the field, so to speak.
It is, I believe, still based on the AEB electronics, which is fine but I don't think that you will find much support for it out and about.
Bernard LPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2011, 18:29   #16
marinabrian
 
marinabrian's Avatar
 
MG ZT

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 20,151
Thanks: 3,565
Thanked 10,837 Times in 5,718 Posts
Default

Thanks for that Bernard, I was thinking of this
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...T#ht_720wt_932
Obviously, I would be using a toroidal tank, new pipework etc, and Autogas 2000 in thirsk, would be my choice of installer for certifying the finished job, as they are tartarini agents, indeed I would say looking at the stickers on the ecu & 'vap, they probably had a hand in the supply of the original kit. I just didn't want to bid on this kit if it wasn't suitable.
Many thanks
Brian.
marinabrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2011, 20:46   #17
Bernard LPG
I really should get out more.......
 
75 V6 Saloon 2003 LPG MGZT V8 260 LPG

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Evesham
Posts: 2,134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marinabrian View Post
Thanks for that Bernard, I was thinking of this
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...T#ht_720wt_932
Obviously, I would be using a toroidal tank, new pipework etc, and Autogas 2000 in thirsk, would be my choice of installer for certifying the finished job, as they are tartarini agents, indeed I would say looking at the stickers on the ecu & 'vap, they probably had a hand in the supply of the original kit. I just didn't want to bid on this kit if it wasn't suitable.
Many thanks
Brian.
Don't forget that you will also need the setting software and a computer interface adaptor and lead for it.
Bernard LPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd