|
||
|
20th March 2017, 08:48 | #1 |
This is my second home
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,428
Thanks: 3,123
Thanked 3,170 Times in 2,096 Posts
|
Tailgaters - change to compensation discount rate
Interesting report on the above - just read that with the change in the compensation discount rate pushing up insurance premiums, it is likely that insurance companies will increase the premiums for high risk drivers.
Insurance underwriters are selecting those with a history of tailgating accidents (and phone use whilst driving) for "particular attention" Good! |
20th March 2017, 09:21 | #2 |
This is my second home
Rover 75 Saloon & Tourer Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 14,890
Thanks: 1,630
Thanked 3,032 Times in 2,181 Posts
|
Good idea.
I wonder how many people will not declare accidents or deny responsibility blaming someone or something else so they can try and worm out of taking the hit on their premium. macafee2 |
20th March 2017, 09:24 | #3 |
This is my second home
MG ZT260 SE, MG ZT190+, MG ZTT 160, R75 Conn SE 2.0, R75 Conn SE 2.5 X 3, R75 Club SE 1.8, P5B Coupe Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Keynsham, Bristol
Posts: 4,211
Thanks: 65
Thanked 635 Times in 499 Posts
|
A good idea penalising the drivers that cause or are more likely to cause accidents.
It's a shame then that they punish every law abiding driver with a price hike. My opinion is this: Insurance is a 'risk' game in that they take a chance that any driver they insure is going to be a good driver & not have/cause an accident. For all the people that claim & they have to pay out on, I'm sure the ones that don't claim far outweigh this. I'm a prime example, 37yrs of driving & I've never made a claim so I have never had anything back out of them. |
20th March 2017, 10:14 | #4 | |
This is my second home
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,428
Thanks: 3,123
Thanked 3,170 Times in 2,096 Posts
|
Quote:
If this means that from now on the idiots that drive a couple of feet from the car in front and those that insist on using their phones whilst driving end up paying what they deserve to pay - rather than the cost of their stupidity being spread over all of us - then I am all for that. |
|
20th March 2017, 10:28 | #5 |
Rev Jules
Rover 75 Tourer+ Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Radcliffe on Trent
Posts: 10,703
Thanks: 7,308
Thanked 3,929 Times in 2,051 Posts
|
I have been driving since 1961. The only claim I ever made was in 2014 when some twonk decide to ruin half of my passenger side, without stopping the insurance paid out £1500 pounds, and then gave me a letter stating it was a fault claim wasn't even in the car when it happened, how can that be right, Rev |
20th March 2017, 10:33 | #6 | |
This is my second home
Rover 75 Saloon & Tourer Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 14,890
Thanks: 1,630
Thanked 3,032 Times in 2,181 Posts
|
Quote:
why does non fault cause a hike in insurance premium? macafee2 |
|
20th March 2017, 11:25 | #7 | |
This is my second home
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,428
Thanks: 3,123
Thanked 3,170 Times in 2,096 Posts
|
Quote:
If it happens now you should dispute it stating that they are "not treating you as a customer fairly" as required by the Regulater, the FCA. Do this in writing and threaten a Subject Access Request to release the file to you and I virtually guarantee that they will change the claims status to Non-fault". The only reason why they try this on is because the want to recoup the payout from someone via increased premiums and if you let them they will get it back from you - the totally innocent party! |
|
20th March 2017, 11:45 | #8 |
Gets stuck in
MGZTT Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Bradford
Posts: 529
Thanks: 148
Thanked 256 Times in 138 Posts
|
I had a house roof land on my brand new car in 2013, the insurance said it was a no fault claim but informed me my premium will rise even so. They then said it was my fault???
I argued my point how could a parked car having a house roof land on it in a well publicised storm be my fault. They said it was because they couldn't claim from anyone for the damage. They did however see reason and reverted back to no fault. Premium went up 30.00. When I renewed my Dolomite insurance being a good boy I told them as required about it. The broker said that it was strange that I had been told it was no fault and has to be recorded as a fault claim. They checked with the underwriters who agreed that it should be an at fault claim and said that my classic policy should increase. However they said it would be grossly unfair under the circumstances and left it as it was. I have since changed both insurances and the new insurers accepted it as no fault so some do do the right thing. |
21st March 2017, 20:43 | #9 |
Loves to post
Rover 75 Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Biddulph
Posts: 486
Thanks: 101
Thanked 145 Times in 90 Posts
|
Only claim I ever made was when a car was stolen. It was parked on my yard, locked, with a crook lock on, and was an ancient Fiesta Popular I inherited from my Nan when she died. The insurance was £150 a year, and they claimed it was worth £100, with a £50 excess. I got £50 for the car, and when the insurance premium came in, not only had it trebled in price, I had to disclose this as a claim on all other policies pushing my premiums up even though I had 18 years ncb.
My question was, and is, if you have protected ncb, that you pay for in the options upon renewal, why then does your premium rise if you make a claim? Surely you are protected from that by the extra money you pay in order to protect the ncb? So someone stealing my worthless car ended up costing me about 5 times the value of the payout in increased premiums and I had to state the claim for 5 years, even though the car was stolen, so not my fault, but because I claimed, it apparently was my fault and legally needed to be declared. For £50! I hate insurance companies. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|