PDA

View Full Version : Nm and ft/lbs


JP53
22nd November 2006, 10:11
Can anyone tell me how to convert 240Nm into ft/lbs please? Thankyou John.

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 10:17
Can anyone tell me how to convert 240Nm into ft/lbs please? Thankyou John.

To convert N.m. to ft lb multiple N.m. by a factor of (0.737)
For example: 55Nm = 55 x 0.737 = (40.535 ft lb)


Therefore 240Nm = 176.88ft/lbs

Hope this helps

JP53
22nd November 2006, 11:02
To convert N.m. to ft lb multiple N.m. by a factor of (0.737)
For example: 55Nm = 55 x 0.737 = (40.535 ft lb)


Therefore 240Nm = 176.88ft/lbs

Hope this helps

Thanks Grey Ghost it helps alot. Day off today so I am making a car info board for our shows. I'm hoping it gets used alot! :D

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 11:07
Thanks Grey Ghost it helps alot. Day off today so I am making a car info board for our shows. I'm hoping it gets used alot! :D

Some useful and MG related stuff here.

http://www.mgb-stuff.org.uk/misctext.htm

Spôôk
22nd November 2006, 15:49
Can anyone tell me how to convert 240Nm into ft/lbs please? Thankyou John.
You could also convert it to toes/bucket by adding 72 and dividing by ½ the length of a shoestring.

When are you Britt's going to go Metric? :lol:

Spôôk

JP53
22nd November 2006, 15:56
You could also convert it to toes/bucket by adding 72 and dividing by ½ the length of a shoestring.

When are you Britt's going to go Metric? :lol:

Spôôk

We are still waiting for the rest of Europe to change to imperial :laughing2:

Mike
22nd November 2006, 16:05
and dont'cha just wish they'd all drive on the correct side of the road. Everything would be miles better then :D

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 16:05
When are you Britt's going to go Metric? :lol:

Spôôk

Never, as far as I am concerned, anything metric gets converted to proper understandable measurements in my head. :D

JP53
22nd November 2006, 16:11
Bring back proper money too, what was wrong with 2/- 6d?

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 16:12
10 bob notes that's proper money, none of the P nonsense, we all know what a P is don't wee. :)

JP53
22nd November 2006, 16:16
10 bob notes that's proper money, none of the P nonsense, we all know what a P is don't wee. :)

:clap: NICE ONE MATE.

Paranoid Carlos
22nd November 2006, 16:30
First off I am 33 years old...........


Call me a child of the future but I have never got olde worlde measures.... why use inch and 4/32 instead of say 60mm.
I realise It's just me thick but I have never got my head round it, (and I was a mechanic for years on land rovers and lorrys which were all AF) All I could do was 1/2"=13mm 11/16=17mm

I really do wish someone could teach me (not joking):(

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 16:38
First off I am 33 years old...........


Call me a child of the future but I have never got olde worlde measures.... why use inch and 4/32 instead of say 60mm.
I realise It's just me thick but I have never got my head round it, (and I was a mechanic for years on land rovers and lorrys which were all AF) All I could do was 1/2"=13mm 11/16=17mm

I really do wish someone could teach me (not joking):(

Sorry mate 33 years old, too long in the tooth now, funnily enough my great nephew 11 years, understands feet and inches but not metres and centimetres. Go figure :)

JP53
22nd November 2006, 16:42
First off I am 33 years old...........


Call me a child of the future but I have never got olde worlde measures.... why use inch and 4/32 instead of say 60mm.
I realise It's just me thick but I have never got my head round it, (and I was a mechanic for years on land rovers and lorrys which were all AF) All I could do was 1/2"=13mm 11/16=17mm

I really do wish someone could teach me (not joking):(

Joking aside now the metric way makes more sense than imperial and is easier to learn. The problem I have is that I went to school when it was all changing. I understand MPG, MPH, Gallons, Pints, Pounds and Ounces alot better than their metric equivalent. Feet and Inches too but I prefer to measure things out using Cm's because it's far easier to divide by 10.

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 16:46
Joking aside now the metric way makes more sense than imperial and is easier to learn. The problem I have is that I went to school when it was all changing. I understand MPG, MPH, Gallons, Pints, Pounds and Ounces alot better than their metric equivalent. Feet and Inches too but I prefer to measure things out using Cm's because it's far easier to divide by 10.

Having only ten fingers and thumbs makes metric a lot easier to deal with. For those of us with twelve the older systems are more appropriate.

Dave Goody
22nd November 2006, 16:58
Bring back proper money too, what was wrong with 2/- 6d?

And then we called it Half a Crown to totally confuse the French !!!
Dave "That shows my age"

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 17:08
New question.
Why was shilling always a shilling and rarely if ever a bob, whereas any higher numbers of shillings were always bobs but described as bob singular, 2 bob, 3 bob etc up to 19 then a break to 22 bob I presume because a quid or nicker and guinea were more useful, and onward to 59 bob but AFAIR no higher. Excluding 40/- as this was 2 quid (singular) or nicker (singular).

I hope all you youngsters are taking notes, I'll be asking questions later :D

Oooo I'm fair worn out now, need a lie down. Thinking is very hard work :D

Dave Goody
22nd November 2006, 17:24
New question.
Why was shilling always a shilling and rarely if ever a bob, whereas any higher numbers of shillings were always bobs but described as bob singular, 2 bob, 3 bob etc up to 19 then a break to 22 bob I presume because a quid or nicker and guinea were more useful, and onward to 59 bob but AFAIR no higher. Excluding 40/- as this was 2 quid (singular) or nicker (singular).

I hope all you youngsters are taking notes, I'll be asking questions later :D

Oooo I'm fair worn out now, need a lie down. Thinking is very hard work :D

Even better question, we had half a crown but when did anyone have a crown?

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 17:30
Even better question, we had half a crown but when did anyone have a crown?

5 bob bits were a little before my time. I'm not that old, "yet" :rofl:

That reminds me I missed out 2 bob bits in my last post.

Roverron
22nd November 2006, 17:33
We are still waiting for the rest of Europe to change to imperial :laughing2:


I bet if the Yanks went fully metric, Kph, litres etc, EL Presidente Blairos would have us do the same....

Rememer Guineas - how much - 21shillings? ie £1 1shilling?

Ron

NOCTURNAL
22nd November 2006, 17:47
why use inch and 4/32 instead of say 60mm.


You wouldn't use 4/32 :rolleyes: you'd use an 1/8, but for 60 mm it would be 2" 11/32 or 2"3/8 :D

personally I use inches or cm depnding what ever the nearest easily recogniseable number is...ie, both together:eek:

also use miles and gallons for obvious reasons, but never have used weights in pounds and ounces??? stones for people weight for sure, but never imperial smaller weights...


On a side note, I heard the other day that Europe are trying to ban the manufacture of imperial spanners and tools now :mad:

so if the imperial sizes are needed, you will just ahve to learn that a 2" spanner will now be a 50.8mm spanner,,,, crazy....
just leave well alone I say...


Nick

Dave Goody
22nd November 2006, 18:08
5 bob bits were a little before my time. I'm not that old, "yet" :rofl:

That reminds me I missed out 2 bob bits in my last post.

Us posh people called em "Florins"

"whoops" one of the wheels has come off my MG badged mobility scooter!!

Spôôk
22nd November 2006, 18:56
:nutters:
Hmm you people belong in a museum:D

Let me give you a few examples of the benefits of the metric system:

1 meter = 100 cm = 1000 millimeters
1 sqm = 10000 sqcm
1 cbm = 1 metric ton of water or 1000 kg
1 liter water = 1 kg or 1000 grams
10 meter of water (depth) = 1 atmosphere (pressure) or 1 kg/sqcm

Now someone give me the same in the Imperial system:youmug:
(I knew we Danes shouldn't have left England so soon)

Spôôk

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 19:04
:nutters:

Now someone give me the same in the Imperial system:youmug:
(I knew we Danes shouldn't have left England so soon)

Spôôk

As I understand it your ancestors left in rather a hurry.
http://homepage.mac.com/mgzt180/mmcars/Pics1/large-smiley-030.gif

JP53
22nd November 2006, 19:13
:nutters:
Hmm you people belong in a museum:D

Let me give you a few examples of the benefits of the metric system:

1 meter = 100 cm = 1000 millimeters
1 sqm = 10000 sqcm
1 cbm = 1 metric ton of water or 1000 kg
1 liter water = 1 kg or 1000 grams
10 meter of water (depth) = 1 atmosphere (pressure) or 1 kg/sqcm

Now someone give me the same in the Imperial system:youmug:
(I knew we Danes shouldn't have left England so soon)

Spôôk

1 yard = 3 feet = 36 inches
1 sqft = 12 sqin
1 cyd = a lot of water
1 gallon of fuel = the correct way to measure it
10 leagues of water (also depth) = You had better be in a submarine

Just remember Stamford bridge! :unlucky:

:laughing2: John.

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 19:22
10 leagues of water (also depth) = You had better be in a submarine


Can't fathom this one at all http://homepage.mac.com/mgzt180/mmcars/Pics1/redwink.gif

JP53
22nd November 2006, 19:29
Can't fathom this one at all http://homepage.mac.com/mgzt180/mmcars/Pics1/redwink.gif

No me neither I think I'm in over my head :D

Pluming the DEPTHS of humor now ;)

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 19:39
No me neither I think I'm in over my head :D

Plumbing the DEPTHS of humour now ;)

Well let's see then
How about. Rods, Perches and Poles. They'll never work those out :) Fishing or canal boating?

4840 sq. yards = 1 acre
640 acres = 1 square mile

What could be simpler? :)

JP53
22nd November 2006, 19:51
Well let's see then
How about. Rods, Perches and Poles. They'll never work those out :) Fishing or canal boating?

4840 sq. yards = 1 acre
640 acres = 1 square mile

What could be simpler? :)

Working out the distance in light years from Mars to Saturn and back 3.647 times and converting it to inches may be :cry:

Spôôk
22nd November 2006, 20:21
As I understand it your ancestors left in rather a hurry.

No, no. You got it all wrong.
We went back for more bacon, but decided to stay home. (The beer was better):D
Spôôk

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 20:24
No, no. You got it all wrong.
We went back for more bacon, but decided to stay home. (The beer was better):D
Spôôk

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

JP53
22nd November 2006, 20:44
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

:iagree: Wot :rofl:

Dave Goody
22nd November 2006, 22:52
:nutters:
Hmm you people belong in a museum:D

Let me give you a few examples of the benefits of the metric system:

1 meter = 100 cm = 1000 millimeters
1 sqm = 10000 sqcm
1 cbm = 1 metric ton of water or 1000 kg
1 liter water = 1 kg or 1000 grams
10 meter of water (depth) = 1 atmosphere (pressure) or 1 kg/sqcm

Now someone give me the same in the Imperial system:youmug:
(I knew we Danes shouldn't have left England so soon)

Spôôk

Easy
1 inch, as most Englishmen can visualise 6 of these and multiply by 2 = Foot
Foot the average length of said item
Yard a large pace ie. 50 paces 50 yards, uncomfortable to pace metres
Acre the area a man with horse drawn plough can cultivate in 1 day
Chain The length of a cricket pitch, how do they measure in Denmark?
Pint sensible size for a beer glass, especially when full as in England only.
Gallon 8 pints, when drinking beer the point at which you wish you had not drunk the other 7.

re driving on the left, I understand Napoleon invented driving on the right.
we invented driving on the left so that if you met an enemy coming the other way you could defend yourself by having your sword in the hand facing the enemy.
Napoleon met us twice on the road and cut himself badly.
Re. time the whole worlds time system is based on Greenwich otherwise days would be 100 hours and we would have to work a 33 hour day. I wouldnt like that.
PS Danish beer is not better, its colder !! Dave:p:

Simon
22nd November 2006, 22:53
Working out the distance in light years from Mars to Saturn and back 3.647 times and converting it to inches may be :cry:

The answer (rounded to the nearest inch) is 18,782,612,515,216,446 inches.

In words, that is: 18,782 Trillion, 612 billion, 515 million, 216 thousand and 446. :eek:

:D

Dave Goody
22nd November 2006, 23:02
The answer (rounded to the nearest inch) is 18,782,612,515,216,446 inches.

In words, that is: 18,782 Trillion, 612 billion, 515 million, 216 thousand and 446. :eek:

:D

By my calculations this is only on Fridays ? Dave:confused:

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 23:09
The answer (rounded to the nearest inch) is 18,782,612,515,216,446 inches.

In words, that is: 18,782 Trillion, 612 billion, 515 million, 216 thousand and 446. :eek:

:D

Are you sure? :lol:

Simon
22nd November 2006, 23:10
By my calculations this is only on Fridays ? Dave:confused:

By my calculations, it broke my little phones built-in calculator. Luckily, PowerToys super-calc saved the day with it's 512 floating-point precision. :D

But due to rounding the anwer could very well be on Fridays :rofl:

Simon
22nd November 2006, 23:10
Are you sure? :lol:

Using the data I found, yes.

GreyGhost
22nd November 2006, 23:15
Using the data I found, yes.

Pardon me, I should have said [sarcastic mode] Are you sure? [/sarcastic mode]:rolleyes:

Simon
22nd November 2006, 23:20
Pardon me, I should have said [sarcastic mode] Are you sure? [/sarcastic mode]:rolleyes:

Yeah - I got the sarcasm. Sorry!

Maybe I should have emphasised the sarcasm in my reply that was playing along with your sarcasm. :o :lol:

EDIT: Maybe I should have thought through my attempted-sarcasm reply a bit more thoughroully. (Note to self - make more sense!) :twonk:

Dave Goody
22nd November 2006, 23:23
I am getting the impression that this thread has slid into the " Sad Old Gits who have nothing better to do at 12.20 am Forum" Dave:)

Simon
22nd November 2006, 23:30
I am getting the impression that this thread has slid into the " Sad Old Gits who have nothing better to do at 12.20 am Forum" Dave:)

Do you not like number-crunching at half-midnight? ;)

But yes, I have nothing better to do. Whats your excuse for being here then?! :rofl:

Dave Goody
22nd November 2006, 23:44
Do you not like number-crunching at half-midnight? ;)

But yes, I have nothing better to do. Whats your excuse for being here then?! :rofl:

Easy "Im a sad old ***" and the stairlift has packed up again !
Ahh I am in the right Forum, " can anyone tell me the part no. for the primary gear cog on my Stannah stair lift??:sad:

JP53
23rd November 2006, 05:30
The answer (rounded to the nearest inch) is 18,782,612,515,216,446 inches.

In words, that is: 18,782 Trillion, 612 billion, 515 million, 216 thousand and 446. :eek:

:D

I knew that :rofl:

Spôôk
23rd November 2006, 06:26
The answer (rounded to the nearest inch) is 18,782,612,515,216,446 inches.

In words, that is: 18,782 Trillion, 612 billion, 515 million, 216 thousand and 446. :eek:

:D
Ha! I knew it. To be exact you forgot 6/37th of an inch.
Now had this been in millimeters..................
:p:
Spôôk

JP53
23rd November 2006, 20:20
Ha! I knew it. To be exact you forgot 6/37th of an inch.
Now had this been in millimeters..................
:p:
Spôôk

:clap:

My head hurts. :laughing2:

Simon
23rd November 2006, 20:50
:clap:

My head hurts. :laughing2:

So... if I told you the answer in millimeters, would you brain go all gooey?! :rofl:

JP53
23rd November 2006, 21:14
So... if I told you the answer in millimeters, would you brain go all gooey?! :rofl:

It would positively run out of my ears!!!!!!

Simon
23rd November 2006, 21:45
It would positively run out of my ears!!!!!!

Well in that case, to save you from certain death (and possible dry cleaning costs of your clothes and furniture) I will refrain from passing over the information. :p: ;)