75's that are ULEZ compliant
At the London & South breakfast yesterday, it was suggested to me that tfl's list of chargeable / non chargeable cars has actually been refined / updated.
In my case, checked yesterday :- 51 reg 2.5 auto - no charge 52 reg 1.8 auto - no charge. 04 reg CDTi auto - chargeable. Certainly the 2.5 showed "chargeable", when checked about a year ago. Maybe we can build a complete picture. Regards Mike |
I've seen a few differences between CAZ's as to what is chargeable, Most have to be Euro Cat 5 Petrol (2009 onwards) & there are a few Euro Cat 4 petrol (2006 onwards) all diesel have to be Euro Cat 6.
|
ULEZ Compliant:
1) 2001 2.5 V6 petrol auto 75 tourer is exempt from the charge (CO2 emissions rating E-255g/km) 2) 2002 2.5 V6 petrol manual ZTT 190 is exempt from the charge (CO2 emissions rating D-235g/km) 3) 2004 2.5 V6 petrol auto ZT 180 is exempt from the charge (CO2 emissions rating E-259g/km) 4) 2004 4.6 V8 petrol manual ZT 260 is exempt from the charge (CO2 emissions rating E-314g/km) ULEZ Non-compliant: 1) 2002 2.5 V6 petrol auto 75 saloon is not exempt and is liable for the charge (CO2 emissions rating D-249g/km) :smilie_re: ULEZ Checker |
Quote:
The Euro standards consider CO (carbon monoxide), HC (hydrocarbons), NOx (oxides of nitrogen) and PM (particulate matter: diesels only). I'm not sure that the "Motorway" ULEZ checker is correct to quote CO2. The AA & RAC websites don't mention it. Simon |
They're calling for more consistency regards CAZ's as there are conflicting answers on some emission sites. https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/env...-vauxhall-boss
|
Quote:
|
At least in the case of petrol cars, I think the existing schemes/checkers are looking for compliance specifically with the Euro 4 NoX value rather than simply Euro 4 itself.
Cars registered from 2001 comply with Euro 3 which means a NoX value is recorded on the V5C, this value is also within the Euro 4 standard even if Euro 4 itself came later. However earlier cars do not record a value and consequently the ULEZ checker treats them as non-compliant even though they are mechanically the same. A case of 'computer says no', so to speak. I have a Y reg and 51 plate and both are given as compliant with the london ULEZ and Birmingham schemes. Hope this is helpful. |
The Mayor of London himself wrote to me last month to advise that my diesel Tourer was noncompliant. I am now expecting 3 more letters for my other diesels! What a waste of resources. If I were ever to drive in London I would use one of my V6s obviously.
|
More total tosh from the leadership in the country that don’t understand vehicles.
You would think the Secretary of State for transport would have a clue due to the position he holds. |
Quote:
That's a bit of a wild assumption there! :eek::} |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:18. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd