I know it’s pathetic, but, in the interests of non-politico controversy and/or the possible intervention from ranking members, any individual who allegedly pays £3500 for a suit that has such short keks that they show the top of his silk socks and occasionally a flash of flesh, and has the ends of his jacket sleeves exposing the upper ends of his buttoned (no cuff links) shirt sleeves, is a peasant. I dread to think of the effect felt elsewhere. Not unlike the Canvey Island dancing facility.
He is also short of a decent tailor. Still, apparently, money can't buy you everything.
Not to mention his misjudgement of what is value/cost effective and worthy of consideration. In short, he is also a pretendeer (the double ‘e’ is intended). Transpose to ‘privateer’. What a pretentious plonker. The alliterative preponderance of p’s suggests a four letter word not permitted on here.
Some of us have in-depth knowledge of higher and wider finances. This applicant for the top job falls short in so many ways it’s difficult not to laugh. But that would be rude. And heightist. And of course one would not want to do that.
The care to avoid any accusations of unintended misrepresentation is considerable, these days.
__________________
member no. 235
|