The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums - View Single Post

clf · 16th July 2020, 15:16

The 135 and 116 as I understood it were not 135 bhp nor 116 bhp.

As I understood the 160 was a 160ps (from the best tested), or close to it, as in a 2 litre m47r engine is not 2litres. But it is easier to call it a 160 map than a.zt/75 forum map (or similar). The whole.point surely of a map, certainly this one, was to produce a more usable driving car. More torque (isn't that what a diesel is about?), better response, and hopefully better economy, without looking like a twonk imitating yanks or vdubbers trying to, 'roll coal'

.

Bragging rights is another reason for mapping a car, but let's face it, from any 160bhp car simply is a non starter for brag worthiness.

Sent from my SM-A600FN using Tapatalk

16th July 2020, 15:16	#29
clf This is my second home MG ZT CDTi Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: carrick Posts: 7,859 Thanks: 3,494 Thanked 2,657 Times in 1,973 Posts	The 135 and 116 as I understood it were not 135 bhp nor 116 bhp. As I understood the 160 was a 160ps (from the best tested), or close to it, as in a 2 litre m47r engine is not 2litres. But it is easier to call it a 160 map than a.zt/75 forum map (or similar). The whole.point surely of a map, certainly this one, was to produce a more usable driving car. More torque (isn't that what a diesel is about?), better response, and hopefully better economy, without looking like a twonk imitating yanks or vdubbers trying to, 'roll coal' . Bragging rights is another reason for mapping a car, but let's face it, from any 160bhp car simply is a non starter for brag worthiness. Sent from my SM-A600FN using Tapatalk __________________ It is not gloss primer .............. it is duct tape silver!