Quote:
Originally Posted by MSS
I agree. It's great to finally interact with another enlightened member with similar ideas.
I would also introduce a weighting system for votes such that between the age of 65 and 75 the weight of the individual vote diminishes to zero. Then there is the question of healthcare - it should be prioritised for the young.
OAP's should be sitting on top of hills pondering about the great life they've had and how bad it could have been, as opposed to continuing to use valuable resources and generally enjoy themselves.
Few more like us and we could change the world......  |
Votes? no voting at all in my society! Kim Kardy B will be Prime Minisdent and she will tell us what to wear and eat. Besides, you voted for the past 50/60 years, you got it wrong, you cannot be trusted.
Healthcare is first come first served, on foot! There is little healthcare left thanks to those in charge, now you see what I mean about not being trusted with the vote?
as far as valuable resources, you are now in your eighties now, you must surely have had your share by now. If you want more, you have to pay for it, after all you can afford it what with having your cheap house paid off. Again another failing of your voted leaders, giving the right to buy council/social housing without consideration for those in the future!
Then there is the personal decisions! That 1976 Ford Escort you bought in 1979, you cannot believe how much it is worth now, well you sold it for scrap in 1989. This proves you cannot be trusted with investments and the like ................ my goodness, you cannot switch off the doggy tongue filter when you call me when you are looking up daily mail website on your phone. That is so 2019!