Thread: 13,000 at risk
View Single Post
Old 1st December 2020, 21:21   #20
macafee2
This is my second home
 
Rover 75 Saloon & Tourer

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 14,932
Thanks: 1,630
Thanked 3,032 Times in 2,181 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richw View Post
It is dead easy to say what should be done: advise the vulnerable to isolate themselves if they want to. It is a matter of personal choice and responsibility.

It is utter madhouse for the government to mandate that we all stay inside and forcibly close businesses (mainly small ones, not the multinational 1% ones). The economic and social consequences will cause more deaths than covid, absolutely guaranteed. There is no science backing lockdowns, distancing nor mask-wearing. Many of our rules are so illogical anyway that is is as clear as day that it is not about fighting a virus (about as hopeful as fighting the tide coming in). Oh, and 'cases' are a nonsense. The PCR test is a huge fraud, so don't attach any credibility to it.

The Great Barrington Declaration is worth a read. Serious medical names behind it and proposed solutions.
For those with known health conditions we can class them as vulnerable but what about those without a known health condition that have died after contracting covid? How have you protected them with "It is dead easy to say what should be done: advise the vulnerable to isolate themselves if they want to. It is a matter of personal choice and responsibility" All you have done is deal with "known" vulnerable. How have you protected the unknown vulnerable, you need to try and save as many as you can.

We know that not everyone will be responsible and some will be irresponsible, how are you going to deal with they and the damage they do?


macafee2
macafee2 is offline   Reply With Quote