View Single Post
Old 24th November 2021, 23:27   #22
Torqueofthedevil
Avid contributor
 
Wedgwood Blue 75 Connoisseur saloon, Duotone 75 Connoisseur saloon. Former ZT190 and ZT260 owner

Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Salop
Posts: 145
Thanks: 367
Thanked 40 Times in 29 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyN01 View Post

Isn't it all about the individual, their skills, attributes, talents, experience etc. etc.

That being the case how is it reasonable to simply say someone of a certain age can or can't do something just because of their age?

And if it's about a "serious condition" what definition is being used of serious? A serious medical condition may have little or no effect upon someone's ability to drive but will kill or severely incapacitate them at some point. That's medically serious. A minor medical condition can have a huge effect upon driving ability. Perhaps something like a migraine or vertigo attack. And surely that should apply to all ages that can potentially drive?

If it's a genuine proposal then I predict an absolute minefield of ifs, buts and maybes.
The conditions listed include dementia and Parkinson's. From the limited information available, it doesn't sound like there is a move to use any serious medical condition, which as you say would be grossly unfair to many as well as legally dubious.

In terms of age-related restrictions, I think it's a fact of life which in other cases attracts little attention because it's generally accepted as appropriate. How many of us would say that 15-16 year olds should be allowed to hold a driver's licence, or vote? How many think 14-15 year olds should be allowed to marry?
Torqueofthedevil is offline   Reply With Quote