View Single Post
Old 24th July 2018, 15:14   #15
marinabrian
 
marinabrian's Avatar
 
MG ZT

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 20,151
Thanks: 3,565
Thanked 10,837 Times in 5,718 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SD1too View Post
RAVE says that the 190 cam provides different valve timing. That’s not the same as increased lift. There is no mention of lift. What you’ve seen in tuning circles Mat appears to be uninformed gossip.

Well Crispin, don’t you think these “apparently knowledgeable sources” should declare from where they got their information? If it’s true, then why isn’t it in the comprehensive press release which you’ve quoted?
Mat; if you have both camshafts in stock could you measure it for us please?

No-one can conclude that the 190 camshaft has increased lift simply because it has a different part number.

Simon
The 180/190 cams have greater lift and a larger overlap than the ones fitted to the 177 Rover.

This is achieved by both a decrease in the lobe separation and an increase in the lobe height, I measured three sets of camshafts about five years back when I revived a very early commission number ZT190 that had suffered timing belt failure.

In addition, the static timing as provided by the camshaft front belt is different.

I hope this clarifies things a little

Brian
marinabrian is offline   Reply With Quote