View Single Post
Old 14th May 2021, 08:02   #13
Dorchester2
incurable Rover addict
 
Dorchester2's Avatar
 
Rover 75 Saloon V6 2.5 1999 - Rover 25 1.4 2002 - Rover 214i cab 1994 - Rover P5b coupe 1968

Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bioule. South West of France.
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 612
Thanked 385 Times in 223 Posts
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by clf View Post
I find there is a massive lag when using kickdown, worse if lockup has been activated. Sometimes this lag is dangerous (eg when merging from short slip roads), so when on one of these roads, I will flick it into sport mode, and it holds the gear and gives immediate acceleration without the 'box thinking about what it needs to do. Kickdown is still available too, but I find it rarely is needed.
You should give it a try, I think you will be impressed at the difference. When selected, if cruising particularly with lockup active, the reaction is immediate.
So yesterday going to my daughter's I've had another try in sport mode on the whole 50km (31 mls) journey which I hadn't used for a long while.
As everyone knows even you'd ask for cruise control, it can be activated only on request (set or resume) and de-activated when breaking or pushing on resuming. Hence I'm using the CC only on suitable portions of the journey, and not all of it like sport mode yesterday.

First of all - as you told - when pushing on 'RES' the reaction is impressive, immediate and even - if I may say so - a bit harsher than in eco mode.

But when reaching the wished speed - in my case 80km/h (50 mls) which is now the limit allowed on a large majority of roads and consequently a tad less than 2k revs - I swear that I'm back in top gear without the slightest difficulty.

Checking Torque Pro statistics on the whole journey (including the way back) it's obvious as expected that higher revs are used over 3k. With an auto box in eco mode and on 50 mls limited roads it looks nearly impossible to go faster than 3k revs but when doing a kick down.
Mind that among lots of short sections between 3k and 3.6k revs, I even went from 2350 revs at 81 km/h (50 mls) to 6410 revs at 103 km/h (64 mls) in 2 or 3 seconds! But do notice it was on a bypass limited at 110 km/h (68.35 mls)!




EDIT: in the table above consumption figures are wrong. Torque Pro can't adapt itself easily to E85.



In the end I had a fuel-up: on 128.62 mls (207 km) I fiiled 24.60 litres which gives 23.77 mpg (11.88 l/100km) which looks rather good for a V6 2.5 because with full E85 you need around 20% (TBH between 20 and 25% according car, temperature, speed and lots of parameters) more fuel. Hence it's at least the equivalent of around 28.5 mpg (9.9 l/100km) with 95E10, maybe a tad better. But my V6 2.5 is a special one with a few mods (derestricted air box, full derestricted SS exhaust line and a few other ones).




In the end TBH I don't actually need sport mode AND cruise control: CC is enough with some kicks downs when needed.
__________________
Rover 75 V6 2.5 Auto Connie born 1 July 1999, 24 kOhms resistor, 10 kOhms manual starter, full E85, modified airbox, full derestricted SS exhaust line, power & torque remap -> 202 bhp
  • This vehicle was the 7,517th 75 to run off the production line, out of 112,381
  • This vehicle was the 1,190th 75 2.5 V6 Contemporary to be made out of 8,214
  • This vehicle was the 2,032nd 75 in Atlantic Blue Pearlescent (code: JEY) to be made out of 2,572 Atlantic Blue Pearlescent 75s

Last edited by Dorchester2; 14th May 2021 at 10:07..
Dorchester2 is offline   Reply With Quote