In the wider and non-P word context, it would be simpler if wider but more democratic (from a point of view of non-partisan inclusion) if the whole of the UK were allowed a vote on what concerns every single one of us! 300 years are important!
After all, we all draw influence and benefit from and have vested interest in our combined future, no matter what a tiny partisan group see as existential. To limit a vote to a minority of committed and diversionary interested parties is a long way from democratic. It would also of course severely limit later accusations of 'a fix'.
__________________
member no. 235
|