Quote:
Originally Posted by macafee2
consider what you have said and apply it to the post office post masters that were charged with I think, fraud, found guilty and yet years later proven to be innocent. Do you still think your suggestion is appropriate? Don't think I disagree with you as in principle I do but the case I refer to shows how wrong we would both be.
macafee2
|
Thanks for your thought provoking comment.
Yes, totally accepted that things can and do go wrong. Perhaps it could be something to be available to the judiciary on sentencing. I was thinking more of the really big criminals with really big money - drugs barons etc. and/or the big corporations who know that the resources to did and dig and dig simply aren't going to be made available to thoroughly investigate them.