court case why should client pay

[macafee2]

If you take legal advice and are told x and the other person take legal advice and is told y, it would seem that one of the solicitors is wrong.
If it goes to court, why should the client that loses, have to pay legal costs, that should be down to the losing solicitor to pay if the case is lost due to a legal reason, such as "such and such case sets the precedence for this issue."

I'm jot thinking no win no fee, it sounds as if I am but i'm not

If the loser has to pay what is the incentive for the solicitor to do a good job??

similar to taking a car to a garage for not starting, they change the battery, then the carb, then the alternator, then the etc etc
if the fix does not work why should cust pay?

macafee2