Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > Technical Help Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9th March 2010, 16:01   #21
markb63
Avid contributor
 
MG ZT 190 +

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: longbridge ( birmingham )
Posts: 246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

did mine sunday afternoon and it does feel more responsive , although a lot of trial and error is needed as i mine was ticking over on 4000 rpm, turned it to far , you just need to take up the slack , you will know if you have turned it to far as the pedal and cable will be really stiff oh and it sticks lol worth the messsing about imho
markb63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2010, 17:43   #22
ceb
Loves to post
 
Rover 75 Saloon V6 2.5 Club SE Auto 2001 (X)

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Stansted
Posts: 374
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markb63 View Post
did mine sunday afternoon and it does feel more responsive , although a lot of trial and error is needed as i mine was ticking over on 4000 rpm, turned it to far , you just need to take up the slack , you will know if you have turned it to far as the pedal and cable will be really stiff oh and it sticks lol worth the messsing about imho
Agreed. Drove mine to and from the garage today to have Kenlowe fan fitted, I think I lucked out on my first attempt as it's just a tad 'keener' on the throttle but tickover hasn't changed, also seems to pull slightly more enthusiastically but that may just be my imagination. As mentioned by everyone, worth doing.



ceb
ceb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2010, 18:04   #23
markb63
Avid contributor
 
MG ZT 190 +

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: longbridge ( birmingham )
Posts: 246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

deff not my imagination lol my throttle was dead for the first 1/2 inch or so ..... just a quick touch now and she picks up straight away , i thought my vis motors were caput , but now she runs great
markb63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2010, 18:08   #24
sean75
Avid contributor
 
Rover 75 2.0 V6

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 121
Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Did mine the other day and initially it was refusing to budge. Spray a bit of wd 40 or 'free it' if you have any then leave for a while.Mine was quite stubborn as there was rust on the adjuster threads but if you wrap the adjuster in some old cloth or anyhting to stop the threads being damaged then grip with some mole grips whilst turning the black retainer it should start to move.

Just to make sure I removed the cable from the snail cam and gave the adjuster a gentle wire brushing then applied a small amount of grease to the threads. Turns easily now.
sean75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2012, 22:17   #25
marandod
Avid contributor
 
MG ZT

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Roma
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Tomorrow i'll check mine, I'm sure needs adjustment...........
marandod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2012, 14:19   #26
Bolin
This is my second home
 
Bolin's Avatar
 
Rover 75 2.5 V6 Connoisseur SE 4dr manual Wedgewood Blue 2 04-05/06/2001

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: N.E. Hampshire
Posts: 4,624
Thanks: 289
Thanked 308 Times in 243 Posts
Default

Hmm wonder if this qualifies for a thread revival award as challenged in the social forum?

I have always thought that by doing the adjustment as suggested on here as opposed to the Haynes method, the difference between the two is purely a 'placebo effect'?

There appears to be a certain amount of 'slack' designed into the throttle linkage, so that a certain amount of pressing down on the pedal is required before the actual butterfly moves. By adjusting it using the 'non-standard' method all you are doing is removing the 'designed-in' slack I think?

So you are not gaining any more power etc when adjusting the cable in the manner suggested on here and on .org, but are just making the throttle more responsive in the sense that you press the pedal less to get the same power/throttle opening, making it feel 'sportier' and 'more powerful', without actually improving the performance.

I.e. it's a placebo effect in that all that has changed is that you move your leg less to get exactly the same oomppphh.

Anybody disagree with my thoughts on this?
Bolin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2012, 15:12   #27
wutang
Posted a thing or two
 
Rover 75 2.5 auto (LPG) & mg tf 160

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dartford
Posts: 1,124
Thanks: 5
Thanked 39 Times in 36 Posts
Default

I Disagree slightly in that using an OBD reader before adjusting mine with foot to the floor the throtle was only reaching 85% with plenty of slack on idle, with the slack taken out it opens to the late nineties % so foot to the floor I should be getting more power, not checked it for a couple of years mind.

Richard
wutang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2012, 17:33   #28
marandod
Avid contributor
 
MG ZT

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Roma
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

done on mine ZT
1) throttle is more responsive and modulable
2) power seems to be the same
3) driving feeling is much better
4) full trhottle the car seems to be a little faster when increasing RPM
marandod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2012, 17:53   #29
Bolin
This is my second home
 
Bolin's Avatar
 
Rover 75 2.5 V6 Connoisseur SE 4dr manual Wedgewood Blue 2 04-05/06/2001

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: N.E. Hampshire
Posts: 4,624
Thanks: 289
Thanked 308 Times in 243 Posts
Default

I'll agree that if the cable is out of adjustment then adjusting it up will increase the power available if the cable was not opening the throttle fully before.

What I meant was if you adjust it further than the Haynes (MGR?) method using the method suggested on these forums - the latter won't give you any more power but will just feel more responsive, resulting in the difference noticed. But it's the same as moving your leg more.
Bolin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2012, 19:33   #30
trimani
Passed Away
 
ROVER 75 V6 2Ltr 2001 AUTO / EMERALD MOTORBILITY SCOOTER

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Poole Quay
Posts: 3,180
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 570 Times in 311 Posts
Default

Most of you are nearly right, but not quite, IMHO.
I think the PLACEBO EFFECT is dead right.

Obviously taking slack out of the cable will make the pedal operate the throttle mechanism quicker, so it's not making the engine any more responsive. Its just working quicker, with less pedal action.

As far as full pedal movement is concerned, I believe if you are using the full pedal movement, with the cable adjusted properly. You are using full throttle range. If cable not adjusted correctly you are not using the throttle mechanism fully, just taking up the slack first, and possible losing a bit of top speed because throttle not opening fully.

So there you have it. The famous Placebo Effect. After a couple of weeks those of you who adjust correctly will not notice the difference any more.
Why? Because You won't go any slower, you maybe will go a little faster. If an auto and you 'creep' to much you have over adjusted. Done correctly you will however have a car that is working as it should.

IT IS DEFINATELY AN ADJUSTMENT THAT IS IMPORTANT & WORTHWHILE


Last edited by trimani; 12th February 2012 at 19:39..
trimani is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd