|
||
|
8th May 2008, 20:51 | #1 |
Regular poster
Ztt Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Droitwich
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
PC or MAC? Which to buy
No longer a member.
Last edited by andycolm; 26th December 2010 at 15:30.. |
8th May 2008, 20:57 | #2 |
Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: -
Posts: 10,318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
I own a desktop PC. I have used desktop PC's and laptop PC's quite a bit.
If I were you I'd buy a Mac. There really are as stable as they claim and everything just works on them without much glitches. If the Mac platform can run every application you require then I personally would seriously consider getting a Mac over a PC-based machine. Try and get to a store selling Macs and PC's and try them both out side by side and compare them so you get a good idea of what's what. If you already have an iPhone then you should find the Mac operating system just as intuitive and easy to use. |
8th May 2008, 22:20 | #3 |
Banned
MG ZT CDTi 135+ Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
Whilst I like MAC software (generally) I refuse to pay overinflated prices for hardware which can easily be bought for a 1/3 of the price for a laptop or desktop application. There is no sense in it what so ever.
Instead, I pay overinflated prices for software which is stable (now) 98% of the time. |
8th May 2008, 22:28 | #4 |
Gets stuck in
Rover 75 Connoisseur CDTi & MGZT+ CDTi 135 Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Petersfield
Posts: 787
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
I do agree that Apple hardware is expensive, especially as it is very similar to PC hardware (as has been proven by some people). However a Mac Mini won't break the bank, will use your existing monitor (and keyboard/mouse if they are USB) and is very capable for something so small.
|
8th May 2008, 23:00 | #5 |
Banned
180+ Sport Auto Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bedford Middle Level
Posts: 17,787
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 5 Posts
|
I disagree that Mac hardware is expensive, like for like quality will cost pretty much the same Mac or Windows based machines. I would only add that finding Windows based machines of the same build quality can be problematic.
Out of the box extremely high quality construction and components, stable operating system, very easy to use / learn. First class support, second to none. http://store.apple.com/Apple/WebObje...ac/family/imac Go to an Apple store and play with the kit, the staff are highly trained and will fall over themselves to help you understand exactly what it is you are interested in, they are not there to sell but to assist, a refreshing change. Because Apple manufacture the hardware and the software, there are precious few incompatibility issues if any. Plenty of free software via GNU (Gimp, Open Office etc.) No need to purchase any software unless there are specific applications you prefer. On the other hand if you are happy to be swamped with viruses, adware, keyloggers, trojans etc. spending your online life protecting your machine from hackers and all sorts of malware, complaining bitterly when your new or existing hardware won't talk to your new system then stay with Windows, a lot of people do. Having said all that, if you do go the Mac route, you can install Boot Camp and run Windows on your Mac as well as OSX, Linux of course will also run on a Mac. You choose the system at startup. Or you can install Parallels and run OSX and Windows side by side. The only extra cost being the price of Parallels and the Windows operating system. When asked what to buy I usually say "if you are already familiar with Windows and are happy with it then why change, bearing in mind you would have to learn a new operating system albeit a lot simpler. Also cost may be an issue, but don't expect a £300.00 PC to be in the same league for example as an £800.00 Imac. a 20" screen of comparable quality will be of the order of £300.00. |
8th May 2008, 23:12 | #6 | |
Banned
MG ZT CDTi 135+ Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
Macs now use Intel C2D processors, generic ram and often intel motherboards. My friend paid £950 for his macbook which is of lower spec and quality of components than my £449 Dell laptop which happens to run Leapord better than his macbook but thats a legality issue we cant cover here
Also, when I serviced a Powerbook G4 I was shocked and the lack of build quality inside the case. Fortunately the all aluminium unit was sturdy enough to stop anything inside getting broken. And I know it seems like i'm 'rocking the boat' again, but this Quote:
I use AVG and IE. I don't proactively protect my machine either. I've also never had harware incompatability issues. When you stop and think about the thousands / millions of hardware devices that need to be catered for for windows its a but unfair to raise this point. Not least when 99% of the time its the device manufacturers lazyness that causes the issue with drivers etc. Turn the machine on, add antivirus software (AVG is free) and behave normally and a windows machine will behave in exactly the same way a MAC will. Now I'm not being PC fanboyish. I use Mac and PC equally. Neither give me trouble but the PC for me is more convenient in my day to day tasks (supporting my client base, programming, GD, etc). Last edited by MGOracle; 8th May 2008 at 23:16.. |
|
8th May 2008, 23:18 | #7 |
Banned
180+ Sport Auto Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bedford Middle Level
Posts: 17,787
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 5 Posts
|
Like I said Mark if you are happy with what you've got then stick with it. A lot of people do.
|
9th May 2008, 00:20 | #8 |
Regular poster
MG ZT-T cdti 135 Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Monmouth
Posts: 96
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Having worked (and played) with both Macs and PCs, there is no doubt in my mind that the Mac wins hands down.
My wife has a laptop PC which is forever giving her grief e.g. 23 viruses were recently detected (even though she only uses the internet for online banking) so she then installed AVG which catches them O.K. but at the cost of slowing up the computer quite noticeably. I have a laptop Mac, which is a joy to use and as far as I am aware has never been infected with one of the 250,000 odd viruses that are apparently lurking out there. But the decision is yours. By the way, a pal of mine has just migrated from a PC to an iMac and he can't stop singing its praises. Di. |
9th May 2008, 01:31 | #9 |
Loves to post
Rover 75 2.5 V6 conn Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Linköping
Posts: 414
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'll have to join the pro Mac crowd here. I have two myself and am naturally quite happy with them but to put some perspective to it I also work as a CIO for a company where we have almost no Macs at all but plenty of Windows boxes (and Linux, Solaris, HP-UX etc...).
For most users I think Mac after some getting used to provide a much nicer user experience. Not being able to run Windows apps used to be a big showstopper for some users but today you can run Windows apps virutalized on the Mac with negligible performance penalty.
__________________
/Erik [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Rover 75 2.5 V6 Connoisseur |
9th May 2008, 01:46 | #10 | |
Loves to post
Rover 75 2.5 V6 conn Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Linköping
Posts: 414
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Then there's the thing with antivirus software: It will detect evil stuff that it knows something about. By all means: Keep your machines protected by all possible means but don't feel too safe... /The paranoid IT guy
__________________
/Erik [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Rover 75 2.5 V6 Connoisseur |
|
|
|