ZTs - Mk1 & 2 Front and Back Comparison - Page 2

sikelsh · 6th July 2011, 11:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by greendriver

v close. I tend to think mk1 for 75's and mk2 for MGZ

I agree, although I would say that as the MK2 is my old car and I currently have MK1 75

Looking good Rich, is that a stainless exhaust fitted or just tail pipes?

Hogwarzt · 6th July 2011, 16:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by sikelsh

I agree, although I would say that as the MK2 is my old car and I currently have MK1 75

Looking good Rich, is that a stainless exhaust fitted or just tail pipes?

The real thing! Frutti!

Brabus · 7th July 2011, 22:19

MK1 looks so much nicer

Hogwarzt · 8th July 2011, 06:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poppy

Definitely the Mk 1....

Hey hey hey ... like the new look but will miss the old

keithybhoy · 10th July 2011, 00:55

I think the pre facelift cars are the better lookers but i do think the facelift has a better looking rear bumper

pab · 10th July 2011, 10:42

Hard choice but the facelift ZT just wins in my eyes,i like the smoother lines of the bumper profile on this model..

Tim_Burgess · 10th July 2011, 19:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by greendriver

v close. I tend to think mk1 for 75's and mk2 for MGZ

Totally agree with that

Hogwarzt · 11th July 2011, 06:45

Like I said I have a soft spot for the MK1 but the MK2 is growing on me.
I have to say it's also pretty obvious that the bean counters had their wicked way with the MK2.

Little things here and there to shave the cost off !!

Tim_Burgess · 11th July 2011, 09:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hogwarzt

Like I said I have a soft spot for the MK1 but the MK2 is growing on me.
I have to say it's also pretty obvious that the bean counters had their wicked way with the MK2.

Little things here and there to shave the cost off !!

No question about that, the midlife faclift was a good excuse to cut costs, thankfully the inherent quality in the car was able to take it; up to a point.

7th July 2011, 22:19	#13
Brabus This is my second home 01 75 tourer cdt,1973 Rover 3500S,,1974 Rover 3500 Auto,1998 216 SE Coupe, 1968 Morris Minor 1000 Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: bangor/down Posts: 4,839 Thanks: 62 Thanked 184 Times in 158 Posts	MK1 looks so much nicer __________________ Regards Neale [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] 121st 75 Tourer to be made 15th 75 Tourer CDT Club SE to be made 36th 75 Tourer in Zircon Silver Metallic to be made Membership No 903 I was one of the 541

10th July 2011, 00:55	#15
keithybhoy Banned MG ZT-T190 Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Glasgow Posts: 1,020 Thanks: 114 Thanked 97 Times in 74 Posts	I think the pre facelift cars are the better lookers but i do think the facelift has a better looking rear bumper

10th July 2011, 10:42	#16
pab Banned MG ZT V6 190+ Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Leeds Posts: 33,223 Thanks: 41 Thanked 1,614 Times in 1,416 Posts	Hard choice but the facelift ZT just wins in my eyes,i like the smoother lines of the bumper profile on this model..

11th July 2011, 06:45	#18
Hogwarzt Gets stuck in MG ZT CDTI 170BHP, PUG CC 180 Sport Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Leeds Posts: 659 Thanks: 4 Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts	Like I said I have a soft spot for the MK1 but the MK2 is growing on me. I have to say it's also pretty obvious that the bean counters had their wicked way with the MK2. Little things here and there to shave the cost off !!