|
||
|
31st December 2017, 14:20 | #1 |
Avid contributor
rover 75 saloon Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Worcester
Posts: 187
Thanks: 14
Thanked 49 Times in 27 Posts
|
Wow! this is great
I have owned my 2003 diesel auto 131 Connie since 2010 and it has now done 113700 miles. I had a re-map in July 2017.
In 2017 I have driven 5634 miles and consumed 119.3 gallons of supermarket fuel, this equates to an average of 47.1 mpg!! The Rover manual says I should be getting 40.9 mpg. For a near 15 year old car with over 100k on the clock this is surely something. Any thoughts? |
31st December 2017, 15:22 | #2 | |
MG ZT Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 20,151
Thanks: 3,565
Thanked 10,837 Times in 5,718 Posts
|
Quote:
It is often the case when a car is remapped, the result if done well that more efficient combustion occurs, along with less of a need to press the loud pedal into the carpet to achieve the same sort of performance than previously. All these things add up to a more relaxed driving experience. Brian |
|
31st December 2017, 16:39 | #3 |
I really should get out more.......
ZT CDTi 135, ZT260SE Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dundee
Posts: 2,877
Thanks: 10
Thanked 331 Times in 213 Posts
|
Anyone who doesnt run the 160 map needs to be medically assessed.
For me it took the car to "Acceptable" from "Embarassing" As for the 115Bhp mapped cars.....I found them so slow its actually dangerous! |
|
|