Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > Technical Help Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12th May 2017, 08:44   #1
Abott10
*
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 227
Thanks: 1,275
Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,328 Posts
Question VVC Inlet Manifold for 1.8T

I have one of these VVC Inlet Manifolds and as some folks fit these to their 1.8 K-Series Turbocharged versions of these cars, I'm now wondering what advantages there are. Apart from being metal with less chance of Manifold Gasket leak issues.

Welcome any feedback and opinions on fitting a VVC Manifold.
Abott10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2017, 09:04   #2
T-Cut
This is my second home
 
Rover75 and Mreg Corsa.

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sumweer onat mote o'dust (Sagin)
Posts: 21,753
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,660 Times in 2,924 Posts
Default

That's about it as far as I'm aware.

TC
T-Cut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2017, 09:25   #3
suzublu
This is my second home
 
suzublu's Avatar
 
rover 75 1.8 vvc club se wedgwood blue

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Seaton Carew
Posts: 26,920
Thanks: 65
Thanked 7,142 Times in 4,642 Posts
Default

It could well be the "Placebo" effect, but after fitting mine, I found throttle response a bit crisper The plenum of the VVC inlet manifold is a lot larger than the OE, so a bit more air can get in Other than that, mainly eliminates the leak from there
suzublu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2017, 09:57   #4
victorgte
I really should get out more.......
 
victorgte's Avatar
 
MGTF, MGZT, Range Rover

Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 2,803
Thanks: 395
Thanked 633 Times in 446 Posts
Default

Mine was fitted 2 years ago and no issues.
The original was ok but the garage in Gloucester that fitted it were not impressed with its condition and said it was a good decision to change it.
Can't say I remember any benefits in performance. The biggest change in the engine was after I had valves and hydraulic lifters renewed. The difference really was noticeable and still is today. 1.8T engine.
__________________
MG TF 135, MG ZT, Range Rover P38
victorgte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2017, 17:28   #5
minimutly
Posted a thing or two
 
mg zt

Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: cardigan
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 28
Thanked 187 Times in 158 Posts
Default

Isn't there a slight difference in dameter of the runners/ports? I seem to recall the std k series is a little smaller than the vvc, si there will be a step - no issue if you never trouble the upper end of the rev counter I'm sure, but bound to reduce airflow at high revs.
All with the caveat that I've never actually checked the difference..
Oh, and the might be a clearance issue with the injectors or injector rail preventing it seating properly?.
minimutly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2017, 23:43   #6
Sheraton
Posted a thing or two
 
Rover 75 1.8t

Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,377
Thanks: 384
Thanked 409 Times in 267 Posts
Default

I agree with Suzublu - throttle response does seem better - and it does appear to have a larger volume plenum, i'm not sure of the pro's con's r.e plenum volume - it seems to work well with a K&N panel filter tho and the combo makes a Good sound


and i think it looks so much better it's worth doing on this basis alone





Paul.
Sheraton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2017, 04:52   #7
chiron_myth
Loves to post
 
Rover 75 Tourer

Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Shifnal
Posts: 422
Thanks: 57
Thanked 80 Times in 66 Posts
Default

Looks alone must give it en extra 10 HP

Like the others, I found the throttle response a little crisper. The engine itself also felt and sounded a lot smoother. Therefore no real power advantage, but extra smoothness felt like an extra 5-10 HP.
__________________
Done so far... loads. Special thanks to Arctic, Lord_Skyrunner John_H, Holland314, JamieWelch and Drewski for their help so far.
Left to do... loads!!!
chiron_myth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2017, 10:39   #8
Sheraton
Posted a thing or two
 
Rover 75 1.8t

Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,377
Thanks: 384
Thanked 409 Times in 267 Posts
Default

the exhaust wrap is "Titanium" heat wrap - i'm guessing it's NOT Titanium tho, just fibreglass - been on there a wee while now with no issues

can't remember which seller i purchased from, bought on ebay tho

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/10M-TITANI...25.m3641.l6368



A VVC head on a 75 would this work ? i.e would the VVC function ?
that would be Cool

do you have a support bracket for either manifold ? i know some have fitted without the bracket - i'd consider the bracket essential for this mod


Paul.
Sheraton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2017, 10:52   #9
suzublu
This is my second home
 
suzublu's Avatar
 
rover 75 1.8 vvc club se wedgwood blue

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Seaton Carew
Posts: 26,920
Thanks: 65
Thanked 7,142 Times in 4,642 Posts
Default

suzublu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2017, 12:43   #10
Alikris
Gets stuck in
 
Alikris's Avatar
 
Rover 75 1.8 Connie SE

Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vindolanda, Northumberland
Posts: 539
Thanks: 111
Thanked 153 Times in 105 Posts
Default

General consensus on the Web is that a VVC inlet manifold is designed to work with the VVC engine mods. Fitting a VVC Manifold does very little without the VVC engine mods. Apparently.

Ali.
__________________
  • Vicky: born Thursday, 15th April 2004 @ 08:20:55. The 95,246th 75 to be produced, and the 4,783rd 75 in British Racing Green Pearlescent.
Alikris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd