|
||
|
3rd January 2007, 16:04 | #1 |
This is my second home
ZT400 Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ellesmere
Posts: 5,948
Thanks: 0
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
|
Lo-Line Nav and TrafficMaster
Lo-Line Nav and TrafficMaster
I have said in the past that installing TrafficMaster in cars with Lo-Line Nav is not going to work as both systems use the same input wire to the message centre But I have had a think. Maybe the two system could be separated by diodes so that either could update the screen as and when, this might work anyone want to try it? DeeCee might be able advise better than me on this if he knows what format the data is sent in Or (and this will work) Use a toggle switch so you can select either, and when on the move with TM selected you would still have voiced nav commands. Last edited by Keith; 3rd January 2007 at 17:16.. |
3rd January 2007, 16:14 | #2 | |
Banned
MGZT V8 & ZTT 190+LPG Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,089
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Keith, is this why I am told I cannot have TM even though I have the right connector block and the message centre instrument cluster? (No trip computer was an issue I understand) |
|
3rd January 2007, 16:15 | #3 |
Owners Club Director
Rover 75 V6 Copperleaf Red, MG ZTT 190+ Lagoon & Early MGF Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rugby
Posts: 9,287
Thanks: 105
Thanked 343 Times in 81 Posts
|
I would say a toggle switch might be the better option - the data transmissions may go negative so diodes will not work in the desired way ...
__________________
Christopher in banana veritas |
3rd January 2007, 17:08 | #4 | |
This is my second home
ZT400 Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ellesmere
Posts: 5,948
Thanks: 0
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
|
Quote:
I often wish I still had a scope! |
|
3rd January 2007, 17:12 | #5 | |
This is my second home
ZT400 Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ellesmere
Posts: 5,948
Thanks: 0
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
|
Quote:
Do you have Lo-Line and the TM plug pre wired then, if so thats odd, unless after a certain point in time they were just pre wiring all cars regardless I reckon TM would be useful via a switch as you can then use it most of the time as in reality we don't need to use nav on routes we know do we whereas the TM system could be useful on almost every journey |
|
3rd January 2007, 17:18 | #6 | |
Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: -
Posts: 10,318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
Quote:
And for those of use with blank 'space' under the ATC we could use that as a switch location . It may even be possible to use an oval switch to match in with the rest of dashboard... |
|
3rd January 2007, 17:23 | #7 |
This is my second home
ZT400 Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ellesmere
Posts: 5,948
Thanks: 0
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
|
I was thinking something a bit more discreet like a micro toggle switch mounted in the cubby hole above the light switch.
|
3rd January 2007, 17:33 | #8 | |
Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: -
Posts: 10,318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
Quote:
I'm all for getting things in-keeping with the original design of the car. (Hence my upgrade to a Symphony rather than an aftermarket headunit). Perhaps a switch mounted onto the reverse-side of the left hand stalk? (this may be too ambitous though!!! ) |
|
3rd January 2007, 17:37 | #9 | |
Posted a thing or two
none Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Durham
Posts: 1,209
Thanks: 140
Thanked 31 Times in 22 Posts
|
Quote:
I was wondering this a few weeks ago when TM was in full discussion when I realised I could not install it due to having Lo Line. If you think it would work I would like to give it a try but with the help of someone who knows what he is talking about |
|
3rd January 2007, 18:03 | #10 | |
Banned
MGZT V8 & ZTT 190+LPG Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,089
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|