Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club General Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5th March 2016, 09:44   #1
Departed 32016
This is my second home
 
Departed 32016's Avatar
 
Rover 75

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 5,190
Thanks: 101
Thanked 257 Times in 145 Posts
Default Would you not rather have this than v8?

Interesting question, but would you not rather have a jaguar s type r than a 260.

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classifi...type&logcode=p

This particular one, although high mileage has been looked after very well. It's been tuned since 2008 and is around 460 bhp meaning 0-60 in less than 5 seconds.

There are plenty around the £5k, £6k gets you a sub 70,000 mile car.

In my opinion a better car?

Last edited by Departed 32016; 5th March 2016 at 10:06..
Departed 32016 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2016, 09:59   #2
charlie 22
Posted a thing or two
 
MG ZT-T 2.5V6, Mazda Cx30

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Greenford
Posts: 1,137
Thanks: 875
Thanked 165 Times in 132 Posts
Default

The Jag is a nice car, but the 260 has a magic about it that you just can't put a finger on. I would go for the 260 all the time plus they made a tourer version where the Jag did not.
__________________
Ugly Duckling
charlie 22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2016, 10:05   #3
Alan123
Posted a thing or two
 
Alan123's Avatar
 
Rover 75 saloon

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Darlaston
Posts: 1,897
Thanks: 484
Thanked 325 Times in 261 Posts
Default

Don't you just love the jag
Alan123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2016, 10:18   #4
Dominic22
Posted a thing or two
 
Rover 75 V8 Plus Others

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Swadlincote
Posts: 1,603
Thanks: 18
Thanked 163 Times in 81 Posts
Default

Jag is a good car as is the V8. The Jag is not for me I think it's ugly. The 260 and particularly the 75V8 is for me but that is just a personal preference, which funny enough is why I am on a site for enthusiasts who have the cars......

You just take it upon yourself to constantly say how overvalued the car is and how much better everything else is at every opportunity, it's like a broken record

Last edited by Dominic22; 5th March 2016 at 10:31..
Dominic22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2016, 10:27   #5
topman
This is my second home
 
topman's Avatar
 
MG ZT-T 190

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 5,493
Thanks: 372
Thanked 647 Times in 534 Posts
Default

260 for me. The s type is ugly, especially that one.
topman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2016, 10:46   #6
Departed 32016
This is my second home
 
Departed 32016's Avatar
 
Rover 75

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 5,190
Thanks: 101
Thanked 257 Times in 145 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic22 View Post
Jag is a good car as is the V8. The Jag is not for me I think it's ugly. The 260 and particularly the 75V8 is for me but that is just a personal preference, which funny enough is why I am on a site for enthusiasts who have the cars......

You just take it upon yourself to constantly say how overvalued the car is and how much better everything else is at every opportunity, it's like a broken record
Oh I do, do I? Thanks for your input. I asked for a discussion but as usual as soon as you say something about a v8 it's like treason. Try changing that record.
Departed 32016 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2016, 11:23   #7
MGjim
Loves to post
 
MG ZT-T 160+

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Peasmarsh
Posts: 390
Thanks: 45
Thanked 140 Times in 87 Posts
Default Would you not rather have this than a V8?

No thank you.
MGjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2016, 12:39   #8
macafee2
This is my second home
 
Rover 75 Saloon & Tourer

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 14,928
Thanks: 1,630
Thanked 3,032 Times in 2,181 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan123 View Post
Don't you just love the jag
no, not this colour and shape
macafee2
macafee2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2016, 11:51   #9
Nev The Bear
This is my second home
 
Does not matter

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: .
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 2,397
Thanked 1,575 Times in 987 Posts
Default

For me personally I prefer the ZT, especially the ZTT V8.
Nev The Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2016, 12:27   #10
first-things-first
Posted a thing or two
 
first-things-first's Avatar
 
MG ZT

Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hornchurch
Posts: 1,255
Thanks: 176
Thanked 352 Times in 272 Posts
Default

I think the S type is not a bad car at all. Would certainly like to drive one to be sure. The R version has a lot of poke and is good value at the moment. Got good write ups when reviewed (as did the MG ZT V8).

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/us...pe-r-2002-2008

As regards the looks, the front grille is a pastiche of 60's jags, a bit heavy handed compared to the way the 75 / ZT evoked Rovers past without laying it on in trowels. Not a bad design, but definitely looks like it was designed for the american market (cue the orange bumper indicators / reflectors) and everyone else second.

I would have either, personally.
first-things-first is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:51.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd