|
||
|
4th August 2014, 15:49 | #1 |
Loves to post
Mg zt-t mg zr audi a6 defender Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Halifax
Posts: 300
Thanks: 32
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
|
Are the autos so much better then manuals?
I must of caught the bug as I'm seriously contemplating buying another 75/zt diesel.
I have a few niggling questions, Are the autos so much better? I've read quite a few posts recently about auto boxes having issues with going into reverse? Also what's better for towing auto or manuel? Why does the tax vary between older cars to newer ones? I've never been out in a 75 is there a vast difference in comfort between the zt? Thanks in advance. I already have a zt estate which I've given to my dad. |
4th August 2014, 15:53 | #2 | |
Posted a thing or two
Rover 75 CDT Connoisseur SE Auto Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Launceston
Posts: 1,567
Thanks: 169
Thanked 166 Times in 134 Posts
|
Quote:
There are other issues with the JATCO box but as long as its been looked after and serviced when it should be, there is no reason it shouldn't outlive the car. On a personal note, I believe the 75 was designed to be automatic as it is very smooth and adds a certain luxurious feel. The ZT I understand is much more fun in manual form - but each to their own.
__________________
You've just been ROVERtaken |
|
4th August 2014, 16:04 | #3 |
This is my second home
MG ZT 2.0 CDTI+ in Typhoon, MG TF 135 in Typhoon & Rover 75 Connoisseur CDTI SE in Pearl Black Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 7,534
Thanks: 2,718
Thanked 2,827 Times in 1,462 Posts
|
I have a 75 CDTI Auto and a ZT CDTI manual. If I had to choose between them I'd go for the auto, its so much nicer and enjoyable to drive, really smooth and suits the 75. Plus you don't have to worry about the clutch. Personally I think the JATCO box is pretty solid, not very often I've hear of failures anyway.
Only down side is that the auto uses more fuel (the 75 auto used a 1/4 tank more fuel than the manual ZT to from Essex to Birmingham and back). And in traffic it uses a lot more fuel. In terms of 75 vs ZT ride, the 75 is really smooth, it glides over speed bumps really well, whereas in the ZT I have to slow down as you feel them more. However, cornering and road handling is better on the ZT as the Zed feels stuck to the road, so more road confidence in the ZT. But in the 75 auto you feel like driving it gently anyway |
4th August 2014, 16:12 | #4 |
Discount MG Rover Spares
Rover 75 CDTi, 2x MG ZS180 Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hythe, Southampton
Posts: 11,320
Thanks: 456
Thanked 3,377 Times in 2,027 Posts
|
I have a ZT-T CDTi Manual and Auto - both identical bar the gearbox.
I prefer the Auto, but that's because I do a lot of town driving - I do enjoy giving the manual some welly from time to time; the Auto is more of a cruiser. You'll probably end up replacing the clutch and hydraulics if not yet done, but panic not because the parts available now are quite resilient. Fit a metal Master cylinder by Tazu and a Borg & Beck clutch assembly, and you'll likely not have issues again.
__________________
Your trusted MG Rover specialist! Tel: 02380 001133 / Email: [email protected] We now have a 'chat' function on our site for even quicker replies. Give it a try! Remember - discount code FORUM5 for 5% off |
4th August 2014, 16:14 | #5 |
This is my second home
Transit Connect Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Crewe
Posts: 9,532
Thanks: 868
Thanked 1,619 Times in 1,095 Posts
|
If you buy a post 2002 automatic, the problems with reverse were resolved by then.
Auto over manual every time It's the only reason I sold my last 75. |
4th August 2014, 16:15 | #6 |
This is my second home
none but not gone Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: March, Cambs
Posts: 16,437
Thanks: 894
Thanked 4,247 Times in 3,025 Posts
|
Auto, no question
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]….All praise Bananaswan…. |
4th August 2014, 16:20 | #7 |
Why? ...
MG ZT+ Cdti Auto saloon. Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Blockeswich, South Staffs
Posts: 1,548
Thanks: 173
Thanked 483 Times in 330 Posts
|
I have auto too, personal preferences only I reckon, the ZT is quite hard on the suspension and having 18" wheels doesn't help the ride, nice cruisers though.
|
4th August 2014, 16:24 | #8 |
Avid contributor
MG ZT CDTi Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Farnborough
Posts: 164
Thanks: 32
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
|
On a personal note, I've had 6 manuals and 4 autos. The clutch/slave went on the3 of the manuals. I would buy an auto all day long. In fact I currently have 2
|
4th August 2014, 16:33 | #9 |
This is my second home
Rover 75 launch car x2, Rover 800 Vitesse Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 8,463
Thanks: 1,115
Thanked 1,083 Times in 653 Posts
|
My own preference for the 75 is auto.
The 75 is a luxury car and i own 2 both autos 1 a 2.5v6 and the other a diesel. I did own an s reg 1.8 manual and to be honest it didnt feel special to me it needed an autobox. MGs maybe but 75s definately not.In my opinion |
4th August 2014, 16:47 | #10 |
This is my second home
2007 57 GOLF GTi EDITION 30 DSG Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Newport Shropshire and Coventry.
Posts: 5,137
Thanks: 2,424
Thanked 1,452 Times in 852 Posts
|
Ive just gone from a ZT 190 to a ZT 180 auto Im getting used to the auto now but the jury is out at the moment as it turns the ZT into a wafter rather than a racer lol.
But no clutch on the floor like it did to me in the old one sat at a bridge with 30 cars behind me! |
|
|