Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > Social Forums > Social Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 23rd February 2021, 11:47   #14
WillyHeckaslike
This is my second home
 
WillyHeckaslike's Avatar
 
Rovers 75 & 25

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Wearside
Posts: 4,522
Thanks: 543
Thanked 709 Times in 511 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KWIL View Post
I did however also say the shear pins relieve the bolts of any shear force.
My understanding is that the engine-to-wing supporting structure is designed to release the engine when extreme forces are applied to prevent any structural damage to the wing that may impair the aircraft's ability to fly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by torque2me View Post
Item 3 - Personally I would think so but again it is an objective thing for each person.
We might be talking about different aircraft incidents. I'm not aware of the Quantas incident you mentioned, it may or may not have involved a GE engine, but that make of engine was not fitted to the subject aircraft of this thread nor was it fitted to the 747 incident that I linked to. Both were Pratt & Whitney engine failures.
WillyHeckaslike is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd