|
||
|
21st August 2007, 12:30 | #1 |
Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: -
Posts: 10,318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
JPEG or RAW?
Just wanted to hear peoples opinions of what picture format they shoot in. Both has it's advantages.
I always shoot in RAW. It gives me total freedom during post-processing. I then convert to 16-bit TIFFS so I don't lose any details through compression. Only when I need to submit them to the internet do I then resize the TIFF's into a reasonable size and usually export at 80% quality (sometimes 100% quality if I can get away with it). |
21st August 2007, 13:04 | #2 |
Posted a thing or two
2004 1.8 Connoisseur SE, 1999 XJ8 Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,163
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
RAW usually, unless I am just doing "snapshots" when I set the camera in full auto and JPG fine modes.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
21st August 2007, 17:03 | #3 |
Posted a thing or two
2004 Rover 75 Saloon 2.5 V6 Conn SE Auto Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rainham, Kent. Garden of England
Posts: 1,162
Thanks: 28
Thanked 42 Times in 6 Posts
|
RAW + JPG, raw for processing, and jpg because my card reader can’t see RAW on its own!
|
21st August 2007, 18:09 | #4 |
Avid contributor
MG6 & MG TF Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Yorkshire
Posts: 140
Thanks: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
RAW for me as well.
|
21st August 2007, 20:22 | #5 |
*
Rover 75 FaceLift Tourer CDTi 170BHP Auto ConnSE 2005 Model Starlight Silver Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Abergele
Posts: 28,735
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
Always Raw for taking photographs.
No other way is good enough I think. |
22nd August 2007, 14:04 | #6 |
Loves to post
ZT-T+ 135 & ZR+ 115 Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: N.E. Hampshire
Posts: 398
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Images in the RAW file format must be huge!!! A fan of JPG myself, more than sufficies for the average punter (assuming the compression rate is not overkill)....
|
22nd August 2007, 14:33 | #7 |
Posted a thing or two
2004 1.8 Connoisseur SE, 1999 XJ8 Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,163
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
anywere between 6 and 10 Mb each and sometimes bigger depending on the camera settings/pixels etc.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
22nd August 2007, 19:02 | #8 |
Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: -
Posts: 10,318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
Agree that RAW files are big but then my 16-bit TIFF's average between 30 and 50meg each.
Lucky I bought those two 750Gig HD's.... |
22nd August 2007, 20:33 | #9 |
*
Rover 75 FaceLift Tourer CDTi 170BHP Auto ConnSE 2005 Model Starlight Silver Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Abergele
Posts: 28,735
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
Raw files as stated can be large,
but if you have a few 1GB cards, you won't have any problems. Just download as quick as you can. |
22nd September 2007, 09:39 | #10 | |
Banned
75 CDT Connoisseur SE Auto Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wolverhampton
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Quote:
It's like using the jpeg files as a sort of index to find the pictures you want to take further. Thumbs plus does this very well for me. You don't have to open individual RAW files in PS just to see what the picture is. |
|
|
|