Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > Technical Help Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24th May 2010, 21:51   #1
mark d3
This is my second home
 
rover 75 saloon,cdt 170 bhp(ish)

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: maesteg
Posts: 3,150
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default synergy 2

what bhp can i expect from a synergy 2 on a cdt? its £179 inc is it safe to put on a 92,000 mile engine i am looking for a bit quicker acceleration
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][B
meets and events in wales

one event everyone should experience http://www.wolverhamptonnanomeets.com/
mark d3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2010, 21:53   #2
JohnDotCom
*
 
Rover 75 FaceLift Tourer CDTi 170BHP Auto ConnSE 2005 Model Starlight Silver

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Abergele
Posts: 28,735
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default

If you have the 131BHP engine should go to the 150BHP mark but ensure the MAF is in spec and working and recommend Air Intake Mod and clean Air filter to assist the added air input required.
You will notice the extra Torque which helps prevent down changes thus giving you better MPG
but if you put your foot down plenty of power there.

The 116BHP engine will go up the same proportionally.

Mines running fine on a 178,000 mile engine.
JohnDotCom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2010, 23:00   #3
James.uk
Passed Away
 
2002 Pale Blue. Rover 75 CDTi Connoisseur auto. 170K miles

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near the M67.
Posts: 14,509
Thanks: 199
Thanked 585 Times in 397 Posts
Default

I know lots of peeps have done it, but is there any actual evidence that the "air intake mod" actually does anything?

Its an easy DIY, but personally I have yet to see any sort of test results? Are there any?
...
James.uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2010, 23:11   #4
JohnDotCom
*
 
Rover 75 FaceLift Tourer CDTi 170BHP Auto ConnSE 2005 Model Starlight Silver

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Abergele
Posts: 28,735
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Yes my rolling Road figures and graphs with it being swapped backwards and forward showed between -4 and -7 BHP difference.
I believe Rover Ron found similar also.
It would also appear to make the acceleration marginally better to. (Having the Mod done that is)
Having a spare obviously helps, the MK2 intake also prevents the problem of wet MAF failure etc.
Bear in mind this was on my own car and cannot show or state across the range of Mods on other cars as only tested mine.
JohnDotCom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2010, 21:15   #5
James.uk
Passed Away
 
2002 Pale Blue. Rover 75 CDTi Connoisseur auto. 170K miles

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near the M67.
Posts: 14,509
Thanks: 199
Thanked 585 Times in 397 Posts
Default

Interesting... Thanks for the info John.
...
James.uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2010, 21:24   #6
mark d3
This is my second home
 
rover 75 saloon,cdt 170 bhp(ish)

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: maesteg
Posts: 3,150
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

i think this would be a good mod for mine then was considering changing it for another 75 after owning for 2 years,various things, scratches dent in roof,water ingress under seats and the front end damage that i am still struggling to get panels in the right colour for but its never broken down so i am keeping it and spending some cash on it and my sister is plaugeing me to get it looking nice again for her wedding it could do with quicker acceleration so the synergy sounds ideal
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][B
meets and events in wales

one event everyone should experience http://www.wolverhamptonnanomeets.com/
mark d3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2010, 21:33   #7
FROGGY
I really should get out more.......
 
MG ZT CDTI

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: 17500 REAUX, CHARENTE-MARITIME
Posts: 2,749
Thanks: 2
Thanked 133 Times in 90 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark d3 View Post
i think this would be a good mod for mine then was considering changing it for another 75 after owning for 2 years,various things, scratches dent in roof,water ingress under seats and the front end damage that i am still struggling to get panels in the right colour for but its never broken down so i am keeping it and spending some cash on it and my sister is plaugeing me to get it looking nice again for her wedding it could do with quicker acceleration so the synergy sounds ideal

Is that so you can get her to the church on time ??

Mick
__________________
http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/a...ps628d4119.jpg

IN THE BLACK NOW
FROGGY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2010, 21:36   #8
mark d3
This is my second home
 
rover 75 saloon,cdt 170 bhp(ish)

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: maesteg
Posts: 3,150
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

no because i am sick of those new fiestas out running me,if my wife would let me have a loan i would get a v8
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][B
meets and events in wales

one event everyone should experience http://www.wolverhamptonnanomeets.com/
mark d3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2010, 12:30   #9
Raistlin
Banned
 
75 CDT Connoisseur SE Auto

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wolverhampton
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James.uk View Post
Its an easy DIY, but personally I have yet to see any sort of test results? Are there any?
...
The difference was tested on my previous manual 75 at a local rolling road in Shifnal.

Allowing for all other things being constant, refitting a full inlet tract reduced BHP over a fully cut back inlet tract an average of 4.6 BHP (ATW) over a total of five power runs in each condition. Peak difference was 7.4 BHP (ATW).

Power runs were carried out in each condition, back to back, such that any change in underbonnet temperature affected each pair of power runs by the same amount.

I can't remember whether there was much change in torque Maybe I ought to try it again with VeeKay.

Unfortunately, I no longer have the graphs so you'll just have to believe me

Last edited by Raistlin; 26th May 2010 at 21:31..
Raistlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2010, 17:19   #10
JohnDotCom
*
 
Rover 75 FaceLift Tourer CDTi 170BHP Auto ConnSE 2005 Model Starlight Silver

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Abergele
Posts: 28,735
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raistlin View Post
The difference was tested on my previous manual 75 at a local rolling road in Shifnal.

Allowing for all other things being constant, refitting a full inlet tract reduced BHP over a fully cut back inlet tract an average of 4.6 BHP (ATW) over a total of five power runs in each condition. Peak difference was 7.4 BHP (ATW).

Power runs were carried out in each condition, back to back, such that any change in underbonnet temperature affected each pair of power runs by the same amount.

I can't remember whether there was much change in torque Maybe I ought to try it again with VeeKay.).

Unfortunately, I no longer have the graphs so you'll just have to believe me
Very similar to differences I had stated in post earlier Paul.
JohnDotCom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd