|
||
|
21st March 2015, 09:27 | #1 |
Avid contributor
ZT 131+ CDTi Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Wisbech
Posts: 196
Thanks: 36
Thanked 30 Times in 17 Posts
|
differences between MKI & MKII?
Hi all,
Trying to make an informed decision on a car, not because I'm looking to buy right this second but because when I do come to buy in a few months time I'll know exactly what to look for So could anybody bullet point the differences between the MKI & MKII 75 and ZT? Although from what I know at the minute I wouldn't mind a MKI ZT as much as I would mind a MKI 75 due to the fact said ZT doesn't look as out dated as said 75 Regards, Michael.
__________________
http://www.the75andztclub.co.uk/foru...48f56c9f25.jpg So this is my new baby, once I (hopefully) pass my driving test on just the 15th you should see me at many meets |
21st March 2015, 10:02 | #2 |
This is my second home
Jaguar XFR 2011MY Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Harlow
Posts: 6,363
Thanks: 19
Thanked 816 Times in 759 Posts
|
pretty much just the bumper and headlights, although there was a change to the thermostat (i think) on the 1.8 at some point but people with more understanding of that engine will be able to tell you when and the pros and cons of each.
If you get a really early 75 i.e. before a point in 2001 it will be pre project drive which was basically a money saving scheme so they had some nice detailed touches on them that were later deleted. There is a thread called pre project drive illustrated if you want to search that to find out exact details. Apart from those there isn't much different at all, you can even change the bumpers and headlights from either mk to the other if you so wish |
21st March 2015, 10:06 | #3 |
Precise
Rover 75 Tourer 2.5KV6 Connoisseur SE Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Fleet
Posts: 2,954
Thanks: 630
Thanked 617 Times in 480 Posts
|
I just do not like the Mk2 front bumper, looks horrible to me, but then like everything else in life, its personal.
|
21st March 2015, 10:14 | #4 |
Banned
Rover 75 Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 173
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
|
The running gear in essence never changed so all the engines and gearboxes are the same.
Remember the 1.8T came out about 2002 ish. The rest is down to saving money and trim choices etc. The Club and Club SE was dropped in the facelift and all these adverts where they claim the car is top spec are normally wrong. One thing that makes them think this is the 75/ZT don't have any blank switchs on show so hence the thought its top spec. The rest is down to looks and if you want a car with the cost savings or not. |
21st March 2015, 10:16 | #5 |
Posted a thing or two
MG ZT-T 180 Sports +, 2007 completely restored XJ 4.2 LWB Sovereign,Noble M400,LR Discovery 3 Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Little Baddow
Posts: 1,315
Thanks: 65
Thanked 148 Times in 70 Posts
|
Differences ? Massive . A pre-project car will feel special , a cost cutting late car will just feel .. Well like a car really . I'm truly shocked at the difference between my previous PPD 75 and my 36k mile 54 plate. It's only when you have experience of both that you truly realise what a difference there is. My early car could compete with anything materials and refinement wise, my current one feels like it was aimed at the rep market .. Which by then it probably was.Project drive completely destroyed the whole ethos of the brand.
__________________
The 75... " It's lovely isn't it ? Makes you wonder why people are obsessed with modern rubbish". Tiff Needell |
21st March 2015, 10:23 | #6 | |
This is my second home
Jaguar XFR 2011MY Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Harlow
Posts: 6,363
Thanks: 19
Thanked 816 Times in 759 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
21st March 2015, 10:36 | #7 |
same car since 2005
2001 Rover 75 2.0 v6 Connoisseur Saloon Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ellesmere Port , Cheshire
Posts: 3,811
Thanks: 379
Thanked 549 Times in 466 Posts
|
Wash your mouth out ! The "outdated" look is what it is all about There is a rumour that Facelift cars were made in a Ford factory .....
__________________
Who said it was simples ? |
21st March 2015, 11:04 | #8 |
Loves to post
75 launch car Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North East Lincs.
Posts: 367
Thanks: 42
Thanked 56 Times in 41 Posts
|
I've owned 5 75's now, ranging from my current 99 launch car to a late 2002 entirely post project drive model, the earlier the car, the nicer it's felt.
I've also test driven some of the later Mk2 cars and was surprised at how much more ordinary they felt A combination of thinner carpets, less/cheaper soundproofing, plain rubber door seals rather than felt lined, and myriad other slightly cheaper built parts adds up to change the feel of the car considerably. The other side of the coin is, the earlier the car the more carefully you need to check it for corrosion, purely just as a result of time really. Looked after 75's generally don't rust much at all due to the galvanised body, but can sometimes rust locally at the rear lower bottom sill area. Bonnets also rust through sometimes at the left or right leading edge. |
21st March 2015, 11:34 | #9 |
This is my second home
Roverless + 1.7D Sportage Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: East Norfolk
Posts: 7,050
Thanks: 729
Thanked 2,021 Times in 1,449 Posts
|
You could always do what I did. Buy a late model, low mileage facelift and retro fit goodies that were cheapened, omitted or lost from the earlier models (for whatever reason?). That way, you get the best of both worlds.
Mike
__________________
Oil in my veins! |
21st March 2015, 11:43 | #10 |
Avid contributor
Rover 75 2.0 CDTI Contemporary BRG (2005) Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Hemsby, Norfolk
Posts: 150
Thanks: 36
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
|
It'd be interesting to see your car as I too have a facelift model and I'd be interested to see what you've done. And I'm only down the road ....... Are you going to the King's Lynn meet next month?
|
|
|