|
||
|
26th May 2010, 21:45 | #11 | |
Posted a thing or two
None Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: GRIMSBY
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
|
|
26th May 2010, 22:12 | #12 | |
Avid contributor
MG ZT CDTi+ Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Donegal
Posts: 206
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
26th May 2010, 22:13 | #13 |
*
Rover 75 FaceLift Tourer CDTi 170BHP Auto ConnSE 2005 Model Starlight Silver Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Abergele
Posts: 28,735
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
Remember to remove the splash shield and all the other gubbins under there.
Many just saw of corrugated bit and cut at the top of slam panel due to the difficulty of removing the three screws to fully release. The air intake of course is not only beneficial to prevent water ingress that damages MAF (If you drive through the weirs and floods in Wales you will know what I mean) The extra air is required after a Remap and/or a Synergy fitting. There just isn't a enough airflow for it to work at its best. (Rover Ron's consensus to). If you don't like the idea or believe the rolling road test on members cars there is of course no reason to do it, always the members decision in the end, no pressure, no arguments, you decide. |
26th May 2010, 22:50 | #14 | |
This is my second home
None * DROWNED Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardigan
Posts: 33,339
Thanks: 1,257
Thanked 1,664 Times in 1,081 Posts
|
Quote:
But at least I'm no longer contaminating the MAF sensor with water spray
__________________
Andrew Ich Dien Problem solving is... lateral thinking SEARCH FIRST ...ASK LATER... Last edited by Dragrad; 26th May 2010 at 22:53.. |
|
26th May 2010, 22:51 | #15 |
Been round the block
75 Tourer Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cannock
Posts: 4,125
Thanks: 3
Thanked 189 Times in 121 Posts
|
I read this part
__________________
If at first you don't succeed, hide the evidence |
26th May 2010, 23:00 | #16 |
Posted a thing or two
None Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: GRIMSBY
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
how exactly are you menat to remove the 'splash guard' it looks pretty inaccessible to me?
|
27th May 2010, 01:49 | #17 |
Gets stuck in
Rover 75. Saloon. Red. V6. 2.5. Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Poole
Posts: 803
Thanks: 0
Thanked 97 Times in 22 Posts
|
Hi for what its worth, on my 75 club se, 2.5L KV6, I removed all from the large flexi-hose onward when fitting my new fan as the coilspring large hose had disentigrated anyway. Also removed the udertray, horn cowlings, induction scoop and 90% of the fan cowling.
My engine now has full clear airflow for cooling and A reliable Kenlowe fan and finally no more over heating, fluctuating between 93 and 100 degrees on the "Hans" scale. Performance; may be slightly improved though I have no intention of wasting money testing this. `She' pulls like a train, has terrific torque, is around normal for a 2.5 auto in consumption and drives superbly. What more can any car do. Mike. |
27th May 2010, 07:34 | #18 | |
Posted a thing or two
Rover 75 Tourer Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,054
Thanks: 172
Thanked 48 Times in 42 Posts
|
Quote:
I do not have a dyno chart to show you but I could feel a difference in the way the car pulls, more low down torque and no problem at higher revs. I did not notice a difference to fuel consumption either. I don't have a lot of experience 'tuning' cars but I've spent a lot of money in my life playing with motorcycles and this was easily the cheapest and simplest way I have EVER made 'improvements' to a vehicle. I'm guessing it is because the inlet is pretty restricted as it came from the factory. Now this may be due to BMW wanting to restrict the motor in a Rover so as not to compete with it in the 3 or 5 series, it might be a consequence of the design of the grille, it might be something else entirely. But I don't really care. All I did was search the forums, read the reports and cut the pipe off and noticed that it 'felt' (by my seat-of-the-pants dyno) 'better'. If you don't want to do it, don't do it. It's not going to change my life. |
|
27th May 2010, 15:14 | #19 | |
This is my second home
lovely little ford focus. Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: East Dulwich
Posts: 7,877
Thanks: 2
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
|
Quote:
???? mine is facts plus a better air intake will give better performance, used to do it to all the cars i had when younger ,and yes you could feel the diffrence in the pull of the car and of the mark had more response. cars will have timing set at what the makers set it at ,put it on the other mark and see the diffrence in power ..
__________________
[ I'm really confused. -I keep dreaming I'm an insomniac Last edited by chrissyboy; 27th May 2010 at 15:17.. |
|
27th May 2010, 15:23 | #20 |
This is my second home
lovely little ford focus. Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: East Dulwich
Posts: 7,877
Thanks: 2
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
|
i suggest that all the doubting thomas`s do it to their cars ,then that way they will see that it works
__________________
[ I'm really confused. -I keep dreaming I'm an insomniac |
|
|