Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club General Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24th August 2010, 11:30   #1
ukmastiff
Gets stuck in
 
2003 ZT-T CDTI '+' a ZT

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: N/E Herts
Posts: 977
Thanks: 4
Thanked 42 Times in 36 Posts
Default 75 CDT , anyone had a remap as opposed to the popular tuning box ?

I am a fan of remapping 'when there is a good one' available for a car , Volvo T5's and D5's are a great example with RICA amongst others.

Has anyone here actually had a remap by anyone on a 75 CDT or CDTI

I found ths some time ago and if the review is genuine and not a set-up then it could be very impressive.

http://www.aronline.co.uk/index.htm?cotm200505f.htm

http://www.upsolute.com/

As time has moved on they now charge 229 for that remap not over 300 pounds.

Regards Mas
__________________
☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
ukmastiff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2010, 11:55   #2
thomas 75 connie
This is my second home
 
thomas 75 connie's Avatar
 
Rover 75 launch car x2, Rover 800 Vitesse

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 8,463
Thanks: 1,115
Thanked 1,083 Times in 653 Posts
Default

Sounds good just speak to the company doing the chips. Also as said in the statement the b*w uses the same engine which in turn produces about 160 so it can't be bad for the engine. Good luck and let us know how you get on
thomas 75 connie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2010, 12:38   #3
Dave Goody
This is my second home
 
Dave Goody's Avatar
 
15 years of 75s & ZTs now an XTrail

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Danbury, Essex
Posts: 3,761
Thanks: 18
Thanked 88 Times in 56 Posts
Default

The power increase seems about the same as a Ron box which is still slightly cheaper and endorsed by hundreds of members? Now a chip and a Ronbox what would that give?? Dave
__________________
ZT 190 X Power Grey The Only Colour is this Dark Silver!!

When I was a kid I was scared of earwigs because I thought they actually lived in your ears. I was even more terrified of cockroaches!
Dave Goody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2010, 14:08   #4
Jake
Banned
 
2004 75 Contemporary SE Tourer, 2005 (55) Pearl Black Conn. SE Tourer.

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 2,129
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

That would give you an apparent flying machine like John Dot Com's car!
Jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2010, 14:42   #5
wutang
Posted a thing or two
 
Rover 75 2.5 auto (LPG) & mg tf 160

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dartford
Posts: 1,124
Thanks: 5
Thanked 39 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Yes there are diesle owners who have had remaps done, the one I remember reading about was upsolute, and most of the members were also running a ron box with it with the air intake mod, erg and turbo helper spring Jon dot com and co are running at around the 170 bhp mark.

I think I am right in saying that only TiRich went above this but 170 is about the limit without changing the turbo.

Also anything much higher would have to be eating the clutch.

Richard
wutang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2010, 14:56   #6
Jakg
This is my second home
 
N/A

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 6,867
Thanks: 0
Thanked 397 Times in 302 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wutang View Post
I think I am right in saying that only TiRich went above this but 170 is about the limit without changing the turbo.
On "the other side" they have had them up to ~185 BHP. Any higher than this, and it starts eating clutch very quickly, although 190 should be possible (albeit with extortionate clutch costs!)

With another turbo (and a rather large bonnet mod) i've heard north of 210 BHP... but the clutch again died very quickly.

Remember the clutch was designed for a 115 BHP engine!
Jakg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2010, 18:13   #7
Kearton
Gets stuck in
 
MG ZT-T CDTi

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sunny Suffolk
Posts: 617
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Default

I have a Superchips upgrade. This is done on a franchise basis so results may vary, however the figures and graphs they publish http://www.superchips.co.uk/ are quite conservative (~144 bhp for a CDTi).

The place I went to had a dynomometer, so they took before & after readings. (I had an ITG air filter fitted at the same time). It went from 132bhp to 153bhp, but more importantly lots more torque down to ~1300 rpm.

Two runs plus remap & filter was about £450.

It is a lot more tractable pulling top gear down to ~25mph. I didn't notice any change in fuel consumption but others have. Max toruqe up to 360 Nm @ ~2400rpm.

I explained to the insurance brokers that I wanted more tractability. The insurance went up about 10% at next renewal.

HTH,

Regards,
Kearton
Kearton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2010, 21:30   #8
buchanan
Buchanan
 
buchanan's Avatar
 
Rover 75 connoisseur se ctdi Auto

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Belfast
Posts: 332
Thanks: 3
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Default

I had my CDTi remapped by Evolution Chips, now 168 bhp/380 torque delighted with it,lovely to drive and when you want to it flies.
buchanan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2010, 21:52   #9
Jakg
This is my second home
 
N/A

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 6,867
Thanks: 0
Thanked 397 Times in 302 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buchanan View Post
I had my CDTi remapped by Evolution Chips, now 168 bhp/380 torque delighted with it,lovely to drive and when you want to it flies.
Hate to do this... but do you have any proof of 168 BHP?

Seems a little OTT tbh...
Jakg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2010, 07:23   #10
car13
Avid contributor
 
MGZT road MGZR wifes & MGZS race car

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: westhoughton
Posts: 212
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Not really understand the old Bmw engines that Rover were given, what is the differnce to the BMW engine, as these from a similar age were 150+ as standard.

I have to admit my 116 is a bit of a slug but my previous motorway plodder was a 3ltr V6 diesel which did fly.

Is the only differnce between a 116 & 135 a remap?
__________________
Vulcan Racing - MG & Honda Race Team
car13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd