Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > Technical Help Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2nd May 2024, 08:21   #1
sean75
Avid contributor
 
Rover 75 2.0 V6

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 114
Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Knocking/rattling engine noise

Hello all,

I decided to get my 75 back on the road after a 5 year lay up in the garage. During this time I have occasionally run the engine and a/c without any issues. When I drove down to the garage to have the work done , coolant replaced brakes checked and general service , oil not done on this occasion as last done 2019 and has only done 500miles since, the engine was as usual whisper quiet. The car was with the garage a week and tested on Monday and passed. the only issues were a sticking brake caliper with a seized bleed nipple( replaced) .

Picked car up on Tuesday and was asked if I noticed had noticed it rattling when cold as when it was took for the test this was evident, I had not had any problem like this since before 2010 and this was solved when the belts and water pump were changed. I started up and sure enough the engine sound like a bag of nails, totally different to what it was like a week previously. The garage reckons its the variable intake manifold so I had a listen when I got home and it certainly didn't sound like the noise I've heard on other intake manifolds that have ceased normal operation.

I took the car back yesterday and explained that the noise had not gone away and sounded like it was coming from belt side.

Having phoned this morning he now says that it'll need more investigation , starting with belt and associated tensioners , idlers, other pulleys and possibly the engine internals.

Seems I'm looking at the possibility of a big problem.

I'll keep you posted and fingers ( and everything crossable) crossed.

BW

Sean
sean75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2024, 12:21   #2
SD1too
Doesn't do things by halves
 
SD1too's Avatar
 
Rover 75 2.5 Connoisseur Auto (1999) Dealer launch model.

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Former Middlesex
Posts: 20,465
Thanks: 1,587
Thanked 3,749 Times in 3,181 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sean75 View Post
... he now says that it'll need more investigation , starting with belt and associated tensioners , idlers, other pulleys and possibly the engine internals.
Seems I'm looking at the possibility of a big problem.
Don't dive in to the swirling waters of doom and gloom just yet Sean!

As your garage says, the tensioner and possibly the idler wheel for the ancillary belt are the initial suspects for temporary rattling after a cold start (I've had this). I very much doubt that there's anything wrong with your engine internals or that it will be a big problem.

Do keep us informed of what is discovered.

Simon
__________________
"Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble."
Sir Henry Royce.
SD1too is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2024, 14:39   #3
sean75
Avid contributor
 
Rover 75 2.0 V6

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 114
Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Thanks for your optimistic reply Simon!

I would like to keep the car ,preferably in running order, but it's very much a secondary or even tertiary vehicle these days as can be seen from my previous post. All depends on what repairs are deemed necessary, I was and still am of the opinion that the belts etc are the issue and not the variable intake manifold, simply due to the nature of the noise and the speed of onset given there were no previous symptoms, there were also no problems evident on the T4 associated with the vis motors etc.

I am however, not a mechanic and therefore don't have the knowledge to diagnose the problem.

Hoping for the best

Sean
sean75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2024, 14:49   #4
stocktake
Vis Whiz
 
stocktake's Avatar
 
Rover 75 2.5 auto Saloon

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 20,593
Thanks: 2,057
Thanked 3,056 Times in 1,621 Posts
Default

Sounds very much like the belt tensioner. If the belts were last changed in 2010 then they are way overdue according to service schedule. I wouldn't be driving / starting the car unless absolutely necessary until they are checked.
__________________
Dave...



Lost a few stones and a Gall Bladder and part of a bile duct and all of my dignity in the suppository incident
stocktake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2024, 18:48   #5
sean75
Avid contributor
 
Rover 75 2.0 V6

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 114
Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Although the belts were last done in 2010 along with the tensioner, idler and water pump, the car had only done approximately 3000 miles in the period between then and now. It’s possible or more likely probable that the tensioner and or idler is at fault and also the water pump. Either way the belts will be changed next week along with all the other items that are driven by them. The reason I returned with the problem was because I know that it could end in engine death if it was to affect the timing .

I spoke again with my mechanic and he still has a (less convinced) theory that the inlet manifold is the issue , however we discussed the absence of T4 error codes, and the rapidity of the onset of the noise. He also agreed about the location and bearing type noise rather than clicking plastic at the top of the engine.
We’ll see what next week brings.
sean75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2024, 19:01   #6
stocktake
Vis Whiz
 
stocktake's Avatar
 
Rover 75 2.5 auto Saloon

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 20,593
Thanks: 2,057
Thanked 3,056 Times in 1,621 Posts
Default

Belts, pump, tensioner and idler are out of service time of 6yr by some margin.

To check inlet manifold is simple:

Remove power vis (the one on the top) it's a simple electrical plug and four screws and off it comes.
Look into the hole it came out of and you will see a brown arm with a slot in it, this arm should move side to side and be free but firm in movement.

Any up and down movement other than flexing of the arm is wear. For the butterflies to be making such a racket the arm would have to be detached from the butterflies to allow them to be swinging and rattling about, it would be very evident on this test if this was the case. Do not start the engine whilst carrying out this check.
Costs nothing to check for this fault .
__________________
Dave...



Lost a few stones and a Gall Bladder and part of a bile duct and all of my dignity in the suppository incident

Last edited by stocktake; 3rd May 2024 at 09:08..
stocktake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2024, 19:08   #7
SD1too
Doesn't do things by halves
 
SD1too's Avatar
 
Rover 75 2.5 Connoisseur Auto (1999) Dealer launch model.

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Former Middlesex
Posts: 20,465
Thanks: 1,587
Thanked 3,749 Times in 3,181 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sean75 View Post
... the car had only done approximately 3000 miles in the period between then and now. It’s possible or more likely probable that the tensioner and or idler is at fault and also the water pump.
I'd say that it's virtually inconceivable that a properly fitted tensioner, idler wheel or water pump would fail after as little as 3,000 miles. Timing belts attract fear and irrational diagnoses. There's going to be zero wear after 3,000 miles irrespective of the number of years that has elapsed. Mine were in immaculate condition after 90,000 miles and 18 years! Think carefully about that evidence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean75 View Post
I spoke again with my mechanic and he still has a (less convinced) theory that the inlet manifold is the issue , however we discussed the absence of T4 error codes, and the rapidity of the onset of the noise.
I have heard manifold chamber rattle. It is continuous, loud and very alarming. The noise is the result of a worn valve linkage so if the actuator is o.k. you wouldn't expect a fault code on T4.
Why do you think that a rapid onset of the noise points to belts rather than anything else?

Simon
__________________
"Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble."
Sir Henry Royce.
SD1too is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2024, 19:33   #8
sworks
Been absent for a while…
 
sworks's Avatar
 
Rover 75 Tourer, Classic mini Cooper S, Abarth 595 competizione, MG TF and a Hyundai Tucson PHEV

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 13,071
Thanks: 1,033
Thanked 1,686 Times in 1,040 Posts
Default

Stocktake gives good advice, carry out the checks to rule out the manifold. Next, I’d remove the auxiliary belt and run the car without it, this will rule out all the external jockey wheels. If the noise has gone spin them by hand to listen to any noises, I recently had an auxiliary belt tensioner fail on a car and it sounded more cambelt related but wasn’t thankfully. Finally. Don’t assume the cambelt and all aspects of it are good because the car has only covered 3,000 miles as the due date has lapsed. It’s easy for diy mechanics to say it’s absolutely fine as they won’t have the repair bill if it fails and manufacturers have intervals for a reason. Just because one person got lucky doesn’t mean it’s the correct approach.
__________________
.................................................

'Marmite' Possibly one of the most famous 75 tourers produced! left the production line as the last of only Three Rover 75 tourers produced in Trophy Yellow. 48 hours later Longbridge closed. The last sold ordered 75 Tourer. Paid for by the Phoenix Four and handed over by John Towers to the Warwickshire Northampton Air ambulance service as a Rapid Response vehicle
sworks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2024, 19:34   #9
dave lincs
Posted a thing or two
 
Rover 75 Saloon

Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Louth
Posts: 1,434
Thanks: 380
Thanked 986 Times in 476 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SD1too View Post
I'd say that it's virtually inconceivable that a properly fitted tensioner, idler wheel or water pump would fail after as little as 3,000 miles. Timing belts attract fear and irrational diagnoses. There's going to be zero wear after 3,000 miles irrespective of the number of years that has elapsed. Mine were in immaculate condition after 90,000 miles and 18 years! Think carefully about that evidence.

I have heard manifold chamber rattle. It is continuous, loud and very alarming. The noise is the result of a worn valve linkage so if the actuator is o.k. you wouldn't expect a fault code on T4.
Why do you think that a rapid onset of the noise points to belts rather than anything else?

Simon
Simon

Sounds like the same old story repeating its self yet again can you please remind me of the belt change interval please? The op has said the car has been stood for 5 years do things not deteriorate stood still? If you say it is not a belt or tensioner issue and it proves that it is and fails will stump up the belt/tensioner failure repair cost, It is quite Simple Simon the reccomend belt change interval is 6 years or 90,000 miles

Dave
dave lincs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2024, 20:41   #10
sean75
Avid contributor
 
Rover 75 2.0 V6

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 114
Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Not intending to start a debate about belt life vs intervals. I fully intend to have the belts , tensioner, idler and water pump changed as I said previously. I originally intended getting this done next year , that’s now been brought forward by the recent issues.

My reason for suspecting a component associated with the cam belt is the type if noise ,metallic and rhythmic, rising and falling with engine revs and the origin of the noise in the engine which is in the vicinity of the cam belt run and lower than the location of the inlet manifold. Obviously until the engine is stripped of the belts the true culprit will not be apparent but at over £1000 for a new inlet manifold I need to be absolutely sure it isn’t anything else potentially more serious.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and I genuinely value the different perspectives that come from reasoned debate especially that supported by evidenced experiences.

Please, let’s not begin a dispute with each other, it’s only a car after all and I am probably reaping the reward for its lack of use .

I’ll post more when I know.

Thanks
sean75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd