|
||
|
10th June 2014, 16:48 | #11 |
I really should get out more.......
MG ZT 190+, Trophy Blue Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Preston
Posts: 2,067
Thanks: 1,401
Thanked 309 Times in 195 Posts
|
Oddly I can see that being ok - the Audi Quattro didn't suffer because of it. Unless we're talking SUV, in which case, no, never. Isn't that why we have Range Rover?
__________________
Commission Number 352 To do list: 1. Reversing sensors 1a. Headlights polished - DONE! (Magic Mike ) 2. Auto dip rear view mirror 3. Seats replaced - DONE! (thank you Mischief) 7. Bodywork repainted 8. Inlet manifold changed for a working one - DONE! (Magic Mike ) |
10th June 2014, 16:57 | #12 |
Loves to post
MG ZT+ 180 Sports Auto Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Clacton on Sea
Posts: 490
Thanks: 88
Thanked 112 Times in 74 Posts
|
It looks a little like the result of a 3 way between an Evoque, 2014 Ford S-max and a Focus ST
i still think it looks great though Edit: think there's a hint of VW Scirocco in those rear lights too
__________________
Commission #24666
Last edited by FezzyFox; 10th June 2014 at 17:01.. |
11th June 2014, 17:13 | #13 |
Posted a thing or two
MG ZT Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: St Blazey, Cornwall
Posts: 1,143
Thanks: 178
Thanked 82 Times in 79 Posts
|
I don't mind the CS; it's stylish enough and inoffensive to look at.
I really like the way the Icon takes styling cues from the MGB. A clever use of the badge's heritage. Some say MG never made SUVs, but who did back when MG was MG? There was the Range Rover and pretty much nothing else. Any manufacturer serious about making headway in the market needs an SUV in its portfolio. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Forum Fiend v1.2.8. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|