|
||
|
8th March 2008, 15:23 | #1 |
I really should get out more.......
Rover 75 Tourer CDT CLUB SE Copper Red Mica Dec 01 ....now deceased....replaced by2003 Royal Blue T Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North Warnborough, Hampshire
Posts: 2,398
Thanks: 9
Thanked 69 Times in 20 Posts
|
Why 4ft 81/2"??!!
This is quite long but read it right to the end!!!.........
The US standard railroad gauge (the distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number. Why was that gauge used? Because that's the way they built them in England, and English expatriates built the US railroads. Why did the English build them like that? Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used. Why did 'they' use that gauge then? Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing. Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing? Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long distance roads in England, because that's the spacing of the wheel ruts. So who built those old rutted roads? Imperial Rome built the first long distance roads in Europe (and England ) for their legions. The roads have been used ever since. And the ruts in the roads? Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels. Since the chariots were made for Imperial Rome, they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing. Therefore the United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war chariot. Bureaucracies live forever. So the next time you are handed a Specification / Procedure / Process and wonder 'What horse's bottom came up with it?' you may be exactly right. Imperial Roman army chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the rear ends of two war horses (or two horses' bottoms.) Now, the twist to the story: When you see a Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad, there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at their factory in Utah. The engineers who designed the SRBs would have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site. The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in the mountains, and the SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now know, is about as wide as two horses' behinds. So, a major Space Shuttle design feature - which is arguably the world's most advanced transportation system, was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse's bottom!!!!!!. Tried to keep it clean!!
__________________
01 75 CDT Club SE Tourer..."The Rover 75 is a British-built car to be proud of." B.M.Ws loss........OUR GAIN!!!!!!!! http://knowledgerush.com/wiki_image/...arp.300pix.jpghttp://farm1.static.flickr.com/167/3...b847e1c5_m.jpg Last edited by Simon; 8th March 2008 at 19:04.. |
8th March 2008, 18:20 | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
For some reason, of which I'm not too sure, I just read all of that....
|
8th March 2008, 19:05 | #3 |
Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: -
Posts: 10,318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
I too read it, so you're not alone
podge: Made it even cleaner for you |
8th March 2008, 22:41 | #4 |
Loves to post
1999 75 Con SE 2.5 Auto Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lower Hutt
Posts: 326
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Amazing… so did I.
Makes you wonder what else is derived from a horse’s bottom
__________________
Regards, Gillian |
9th March 2008, 06:56 | #5 |
I really should get out more.......
MINI COOPER S Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tranent, East Lothian, SCOTLAND
Posts: 2,834
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Roses? Think about it.
__________________
.......................................Colin |
9th March 2008, 17:13 | #6 |
I really should get out more.......
Rover 75 Tourer CDT CLUB SE Copper Red Mica Dec 01 ....now deceased....replaced by2003 Royal Blue T Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North Warnborough, Hampshire
Posts: 2,398
Thanks: 9
Thanked 69 Times in 20 Posts
|
Oh Dear....Oh Dear...what have I started here..So apart from Roses what have horses bottoms done for us!!!!!!!!
SORRY Mods..just could not resist that!!P.
__________________
01 75 CDT Club SE Tourer..."The Rover 75 is a British-built car to be proud of." B.M.Ws loss........OUR GAIN!!!!!!!! http://knowledgerush.com/wiki_image/...arp.300pix.jpghttp://farm1.static.flickr.com/167/3...b847e1c5_m.jpg |
9th March 2008, 17:37 | #7 |
I really should get out more.......
Rover 75 Saloon 2.5V6+Auto - Pack Luxe & Sterling Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Paris-France & Cairo-Egypt
Posts: 2,122
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
In my mother country, we have a saying:
It's always the Italians fault... (or slightly modified: blame the Italians)
__________________
Majed [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Member no. 36 - Samarkand, I miss you so much "Miss April 2010"! |
10th March 2008, 10:11 | #8 |
Loves to post
75 saloon 2003 cdti conn se (ronned) Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: stafford
Posts: 321
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
strangly facinating (if true) thanks
|
28th December 2008, 20:02 | #9 |
Newbie
Rover 75 Con SE Auto Tourer Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St Ives
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
29th December 2008, 08:05 | #10 |
Posted a thing or two
Rover 75 Connoisseur SE CDT Tourer - naturally in Moonstone Green Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Surrey - near Gatwick Airport
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
AH, but Gods Wonderful Railway used 7 feet which would have enabled better more comfortable trains had there not been pressure to adopt the standard gauge.
|
|
|