|
||
|
3rd November 2017, 09:13 | #31 |
I really should get out more.......
BMW X3 2.0D Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tipton
Posts: 2,383
Thanks: 51
Thanked 765 Times in 421 Posts
|
I'd be down for one of these, But I've got to replace the diagnostic socket on my car first. Somebody had damaged the pins before I bought it so it's not talking to anything right now.
__________________
Current car: BMW x3 2.0d (The one with the M47 engine!) Rolled off the line on December 14th, 2004. |
3rd November 2017, 09:27 | #32 |
Gets stuck in
ROVER 75 SALOON Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 597
Thanks: 386
Thanked 316 Times in 144 Posts
|
This maybe totally irrelevant.If a custom map is carried out to the vehicle.How is the vehicle category defined for insurance purposes .Do you have to show the insurance company dyno results? Also are the standard braking systems ,transmissions,engine mountings etc etc adequate for the maps .Please dont take this in any way as negativity but we all know how insurance companies twist and turn to avoid liability.I fully understand the way engine characteristics can change with mapping as I personally map engines on a daily basis .These are gas engines with outputs of between 200kw to 1500 kw.
|
3rd November 2017, 14:50 | #33 | ||||
Avid contributor
MG ZT Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Manchester
Posts: 237
Thanks: 20
Thanked 108 Times in 56 Posts
|
Quote:
Exhaust cam on the inlet I think is the proposed idea, never seen it done or heard much about it in practise. Think the cost of messing with the Kv6 puts alot of folks off. I'd be very interested in testing the de-flapped vs working manifolds. Think I know which will perform best but the results would be the true teller. When I'm finishing up with the ECU side I'll drop folks a message and to check the very generous offer still stands Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Brakes are a tricky one, you should always have sufficient braking to suit the car but.... 30mph is 30mph regardless of how much power under the bonnet so a simple town driver wouldn't necessarily require an upgrade. If you're ramming it down country lanes then it might be worth looking into just in case things get a bit too toasty... Those are some impressive figures, is the mapping for efficiency purposes/design of new models/maintaince Last edited by sworks; 5th November 2017 at 08:46.. |
||||
3rd November 2017, 15:27 | #34 | |
I really should get out more.......
BMW X3 2.0D Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tipton
Posts: 2,383
Thanks: 51
Thanked 765 Times in 421 Posts
|
Quote:
Pushed in I think. Tried to get it to talk to a T4 but the results were all over the shop. Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk
__________________
Current car: BMW x3 2.0d (The one with the M47 engine!) Rolled off the line on December 14th, 2004. Last edited by Bogbrush82; 3rd November 2017 at 15:51.. |
|
3rd November 2017, 15:29 | #35 |
Gets stuck in
ROVER 75 SALOON Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 597
Thanks: 386
Thanked 316 Times in 144 Posts
|
The engines I work on are powered by methane This is created by anaerobic digestion .The methane content is not ambient and can range from 52% up to 90% The rest being Hydrogen Sulphide .Thus the requirement for constant mapping .The requirements are stability to attain a constant running speed of 1500 rpm this enables the engine to produce power at 50Hz enabling the set to synchronize with the grid .Obviously power output is important So the maximum output is required without losing stability . As you are aware there are lots of factors to be taken into consideration when mapping engines other than maximum output .One advantage with petrol engines is that the octane ratings are pretty stable and turbos are quite inexpensive .The turbo temperatures on gas engines can rise in seconds from 700deg c to 1200deg c due to a pocket of gas being released into the manifold .Replacement turbos when this occurs cost in the region of £35,000!
|
3rd November 2017, 20:07 | #36 |
Premium Trader
Rover 75 Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Devon
Posts: 33,765
Thanks: 8,837
Thanked 14,831 Times in 8,030 Posts
|
Yes, the perfect remap is the one that the customer is 100% happy with, and one that will not cause any damage to an engine.
__________________
Lest we forget..
|
3rd November 2017, 22:12 | #37 | ||
Avid contributor
MG ZT Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Manchester
Posts: 237
Thanks: 20
Thanked 108 Times in 56 Posts
|
Quote:
Those are some toasty temperatures, might seem a silly question but are like similar wastegate/VNT units or are they perhaps oversized so as to avoid the need for these mechanisms? Still...wouldn't want to be the guy to explain to the boss that the turbo just blew up haha Quote:
In terms of dates, looking at either... 19th November or 10th/17th December. If no good then happy to postpone to the new years? Last edited by sworks; 5th November 2017 at 08:49.. |
||
3rd November 2017, 22:51 | #38 | |
This is my second home
N/A Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 6,867
Thanks: 0
Thanked 397 Times in 302 Posts
|
Quote:
An alternative (although not necessarily a great one). |
|
4th November 2017, 06:08 | #39 |
Avid contributor
MG ZT Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Manchester
Posts: 237
Thanks: 20
Thanked 108 Times in 56 Posts
|
This is true, we can write files to it without the car/obd socket.
However for dyno tuning (which is recommended for best results) we would use the OBD for data logging purposes as well plus if making multiple adjustments it adds a quite a bit of time to the process to keep disconnecting/reconnecting etc |
4th November 2017, 07:44 | #40 |
Posted a thing or two
Rover 75 Cont SE 1.8T Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,082
Thanks: 215
Thanked 232 Times in 178 Posts
|
Out of interest, what sort of returns could be expected from a remapped standard 75 1.8T auto tuned for extra economy and torque rather than all-out power?
__________________
Rover 75 1.8T Contemporary SE Auto Starlight Silver MBB |
|
|