|
||
|
3rd April 2019, 18:11 | #1 |
Newbie
none at the moment Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
prospective purchase
Hi folks, my first post will tempt many of you to move on as I'm sure the subject has been well aired, but for those who read on I thank you
I've been seriously thinking of a 75 purchase, so could I pose the following queries please: Is there a noticeable difference in terms of everyday driving between the CDT & CDTi engines? Do the reduced build quality (allegations) &/or the accountant's 'pruning' of the car's specification after the face-lift really detract from 75 ownership experience? I've read that the late cars are more like BMW's than Rovers. nb: with reference to the 'members cars for sale' couldn't the adverts be removed post sale? It's frustrating to click on an ad. & read through all the details, only to find that the cars' been sold. Sorry |
3rd April 2019, 18:28 | #2 | |
This is my second home
Rover 75CDT, Jaguar XF-S 3.0V6, V'xhall Omega V6 Estate, Twintop 1.8VVT, Astra Estate and Corsa 1.2 Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,085
Thanks: 283
Thanked 624 Times in 440 Posts
|
Quote:
With respect to the engine, the CDT/CDTi differenttaion is not worth worrying about - you should however get the 131BHP variant as opposed to 113 BHP as the difference in power does have a real effect on drivability. In my opinion you should aim to purchase the newest car possible so that you have the pleasure of owning it as long as possible. Also, IMO, there is no difference in driving experience between pre and post project drive cars. Later cars will not necessarily have all the toys that earlier cars had but, again in my opinion, no amount of toys are ever going to compensate for a car where the fundamentals are not spot on. This is what I would always focus on as opposed to the toys or the colour of the interior etc. |
|
3rd April 2019, 20:24 | #3 | |
Posted a thing or two
Rover 75 Cont SE 1.8T Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,082
Thanks: 215
Thanked 232 Times in 178 Posts
|
Quote:
The equipment tally on the cars didn't change hugely until the car was facelifted and trim levels realigned. No version of the 75 is basic, apart from the rare Classic model with its steel wheels, manual rear windows and lack of air con. Most 75s out there are higher spec variants anyway and owners were often keen to add extras when buying the cars new. Anything a car is missing can potentially be retrofitted.
__________________
Rover 75 1.8T Contemporary SE Auto Starlight Silver MBB |
|
3rd April 2019, 20:36 | #4 | |
This is my second home
Rover 75 CDT Manual Connoisseur SE, Rover 75 CDT Automatic Connoisseur SE & a Freelander Td4. Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 11,548
Thanks: 3,470
Thanked 3,119 Times in 2,247 Posts
|
Quote:
Having owned both earlier and later models I much prefer the Mk1s, but each to their own. As mentioned overall condition of the car you buy is paramount, and don't forget to check everything underneath - plenty of cars look nice and shiny above decks even though the subframes and rear sills are rusting. |
|
3rd April 2019, 20:58 | #5 |
This is my second home
None Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: None
Posts: 5,556
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,161 Times in 924 Posts
|
It's all been said above, my Facelift (04) drives and feels the same as my previous Mk1. It is noticeably less rusty underneath than the Mk1 though. Regarding power, the Facelift was 131/135 whatever and felt powerwise close to the remapped Mk1 I had. I still had it mapped to 160 for the driveability aspect. So yes, to summarise, get the newest one you can afford and check for tinworm, mileage isn't too important on the diesel but a low miler is a bonus.
|
3rd April 2019, 21:41 | #6 |
Senior Citizen
Rover 75 2.5 Connoisseur SE,Chrysler 300C,124 Spider, Daytona 955i,Honda XL250 & Royal Enfield 650GT Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Kingdom of Wessex
Posts: 6,976
Thanks: 2,391
Thanked 2,685 Times in 1,686 Posts
|
I disagree with buying the newest one you can afford.
In my view, it is best to get one in the best condition, irrespective of age. My personal choice would be to find a good late Cowley or early Longbridge car. I have owned both and were/are very good cars. The later Longbridge car, that I have, has suffered more corrosion and is not in the same class as the earlier examples. The refinement was definitely stripped out of these cars over the years under Project Drive IMHO. I suppose everyone's experience is different. This is just my experience. Sent from my SM-T813 using Tapatalk
__________________
Let the good times roll............ |
4th April 2019, 18:32 | #7 | |
Newbie
none at the moment Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
With regard to your post Mike, does an engine upgrade (esp. all the way to 160) introduce NVH or longevity issues, especially as we are talking auto's here. Also I've read that the cars can lose their celebrated ride comfort due to tired suspension, at what sort of mileage (average) is this likely to become an issue for a perspective purchaser ? . |
|
4th April 2019, 18:52 | #8 |
Regular poster
None at the moment Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Newtownards
Posts: 44
Thanks: 64
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
I bought a 2004 diesel manual gearbox saloon with 148,000 miles on it in November of last year. It is remarkably rust free but has been well serviced all it's life.
A new clutch master cylinder, two new front springs and a drivers door lock cable are the only things needed other than oil and filters change and two new front tyres in the last 8,000 miles that I have done in the last 4 months or so. It rides very nicely, with no squeaks or rattles with only wear on the drivers seat bolster and the steering wheel to show for the mileage on it. Buy on condition and service history rather than age or mileage. You will not be disappointed. |
4th April 2019, 19:24 | #9 | |
This is my second home
Rover 75 CDT Manual Connoisseur SE, Rover 75 CDT Automatic Connoisseur SE & a Freelander Td4. Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 11,548
Thanks: 3,470
Thanked 3,119 Times in 2,247 Posts
|
Quote:
Regarding the ride comfort then yes it does deteriorate over the years, but depends on many factors. Best to try a few car and see what takes your fancy. . Last edited by Mike Noc; 4th April 2019 at 19:30.. |
|
5th April 2019, 07:55 | #10 |
Newbie
none at the moment Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Finally folks, bearing in mind that the manuf. of these cars ceased 13 years ago, what's the current situation for replacement parts? Consumables such as tyres, exhausts, brake pads etc. are presumably no problem, but what about mechanical & electrical components specific to the model?
|
|
|