Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > Technical Help Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26th August 2021, 13:36   #1
AlexF75
Newbie
 
'00 Rover 75 2.5 V6 Crown saloon

Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Budapest
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Intake manifold - removing flaps worth it? 2.5 auto

As the title.

I don't (yet) have a problem with the intake manifold, but when I do, I'd like to know whether completely removing the flaps would make a positive or negative influence on the engine performance and economy.

I wouldn't mind just a bit more oomph from my 2.5 KV6, to be honest, not slow at all but I had an E46 30i and E36 28i convertible which are both just a tad more powerful - that "tad more powerful" can definitely be felt though, I'm used to 200-ish horsepower.

So the questions are - and sorry if there is another thread about this where my question is answered, I couldn't find it, so if there is please provide a link:

1) Will engine performance improve by removing the flaps? My guess is it should, since even when the flaps are open, they are blocking a few percent of the airflow which would be "added" if I removed them.
2) How will engine characteristics change? My guess is low down torque would be somewhat compromised, and since I have an auto box (which tends to keep revs low unless it's absolutely necessary to accelerate quickly - so unless I pretty much floor it), would that effect be noticably negative?
I'm also thinking top end is where I would get slightly more power.
3) How will fuel economy change?
4) Does the software need any tweaking (and if so, how) to adjust to the removal of the flaps? AFAIK it does not.


Thanks for the replies in advance, and if that reply is a link to a thread where all these questions had already been answered, I'm sorry.

+1: If you have any cheap ways to slightly improve performance of this engine, please don't hesitate. I'm only thinking bolt-ons though, no taking the engine apart for modding internals or anything of that scale.

Last edited by AlexF75; 26th August 2021 at 13:42.. Reason: Added question
AlexF75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2021, 13:51   #2
xsport
Posted a thing or two
 
rover 75 club se

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Leicester
Posts: 1,637
Thanks: 358
Thanked 419 Times in 310 Posts
Default

a lot of time and effort involved in removal of the flaps. at the end of the day there will not be much difference. the kv6 is known not to be torquey at low revs anyway so you wont achieve much. stick with the flaps if they are functioning ok and keep your vis motors working well. i dont know if anyone on here has ever tried removing the flaps and then a remap but again more trouble than what its worth in my opinion. if you have an auto you can use sport and hold manually through the gears but have some respect for the old girl ... its not a BMW engine at the end of the day. ...
xsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2021, 14:41   #3
vitesse
I really should get out more.......
 
Rover 75 Saloon

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Gävle
Posts: 2,528
Thanks: 395
Thanked 823 Times in 652 Posts
Default

Sure you can remove the flaps but it will be gutless lower down in the rev range. I have a ZS180 which has been de-flapped by a previous owner, one of the plans I have is putting in a standard manifold.

Regards
vitesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2021, 18:14   #4
SD1too
Doesn't do things by halves
 
SD1too's Avatar
 
Rover 75 2.5 Connoisseur Auto (1999) Dealer launch model.

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Former Middlesex
Posts: 20,344
Thanks: 1,587
Thanked 3,749 Times in 3,181 Posts
Default

Hello Alex,
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexF75 View Post
I don't (yet) have a problem with the intake manifold, but when I do ...
Err ... I think you mean if I do. The only fault which requires replacement of the manifold chamber (the black plastic assembly as opposed to the inlet manifolds which are aluminium) is damage to the power valve linkage. If you keep your VIS actuators in working order this shouldn't happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexF75 View Post
I'd like to know whether completely removing the flaps would make a positive or negative influence on the engine performance and economy.
Negative. The VIS system tunes the inlet tracts to smooth the peaks and troughs in the torque graph. It's well known that when the balance flap sticks partially open, the engine torque noticeably suffers. Imagine what will happen if it's removed completely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexF75 View Post
If you have any cheap ways to slightly improve performance of this engine, please don't hesitate. I'm only thinking bolt-ons though, no taking the engine apart for modding internals or anything of that scale.
There is a cheap way to restore engine performance but not via "boy racer" bolt-ons I'm afraid! If you're curious, here are the details.
  • Check that the balance flap can move freely and isn't sticking partially open (a common fault).
  • Check that the power valve linkage is also free to move with minimal play.
  • Check that both actuators are operational.
  • Remove the cam covers* and clear the blocked pinhole in the breather circuit to be found underneath the gauze filter.
* This is definitely a job for whoever services and repairs your car.

Best wishes,

Simon
__________________
"Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble."
Sir Henry Royce.
SD1too is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2021, 13:51   #5
ZedTeeT
Gets stuck in
 
ZedTeeT's Avatar
 
MG ZT-T

Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Horsham
Posts: 874
Thanks: 197
Thanked 239 Times in 207 Posts
Default

The long and the short of it is, don't bother if it's all working, you'll gain hardly anything, if anything at all, right up the very top and loose plenty low down. Why would anyone want that, the overall drivability would be much reduced. The KV6 has its limitations.
__________________
My garage.
03/53 MG ZT-T+ CDTi auto in XPG. 232k and much to do!
21/21 MG ZS ev. Daily.
85/C Capri 2.8i Special. Mine 29+ years.
82/X Talbot Tagora SX V6. Restoration project.
11/11 Hyundai I Load CRDi. Van....... nuff said.
ZedTeeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2021, 20:19   #6
trikey
Premium Trader
 
trikey's Avatar
 
Rover 75

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Devon
Posts: 33,763
Thanks: 8,837
Thanked 14,831 Times in 8,030 Posts
Default

Debs old 180 had the flaps removed by a previous owner, no low down power at all, the top end was ok if you were thrashing it!

I swapped the manifold for a standard one and the low down torque was restored.
__________________
Lest we forget..
trikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2021, 20:28   #7
AlexF75
Newbie
 
'00 Rover 75 2.5 V6 Crown saloon

Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Budapest
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Thanks loads for your tips, it's clear in my head now! I'll just keep it working then. Fortunately I received three replacement VIS motors that work with the car, so that's a plus.

Not too bothered by the "lower performance" than my previous cars, I usually just cruise around with my 75 as that's what it does best - but I do occasionally go to the deristricted German autobahn with it, and that's where I sometimes wish it had some more power.

Not a BMW engine though, that's true! I love the character of the KV6 and much prefer the sound it makes to the straight 6 of BMWs that I had and have, but those engines were absolutely bulletproof, my 46 had 400k kilometres without any major engine repair ever, 36 running close to 300k so far not even any oil consumption. Not sure this can last that long, but I'll do my best to make it do! 170k kms as of yet though so I have to keep it long to make it there, so far I love it and much prefer it to the 46 it replaced in my "fleet" so we'll see
__________________
_______________________________________________
Garage:

2000 Rover 75 2.5 V6 Crown (auto)
1997 BMW E36 328i Convertible
2015 Hyundai i20 1.25 (it's the city beater that I always find an excuse to replace for the day with one of the others - nice car for what it is though)
1991 Ford Scorpio 2.0 DOHC Ghia Mk1
1995 Ford Escort 1.3 CL (inherited this, absolutely perfect condition so it's just a keeper)

Last edited by AlexF75; 27th August 2021 at 20:38..
AlexF75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2021, 20:36   #8
trikey
Premium Trader
 
trikey's Avatar
 
Rover 75

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Devon
Posts: 33,763
Thanks: 8,837
Thanked 14,831 Times in 8,030 Posts
Default

Still plenty of miles (Or Kilometres) Left yet in your KV6, some have done well over 200k miles.
__________________
Lest we forget..
trikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th August 2021, 20:41   #9
xsport
Posted a thing or two
 
rover 75 club se

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Leicester
Posts: 1,637
Thanks: 358
Thanked 419 Times in 310 Posts
Default

yes R40 built for comfort not speed. the ZT models were better suited for a drivers car and hold the road well. lovely cars the 75 for the motorways where they seem to be at their best. ...
xsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd